bugGNU Octave - Bugs: bug #46280, typo in Manual section 8.5.2...

 
 

bug #46280: typo in Manual section 8.5.2 Short-circuit Boolean Operators

Submitter:  Nicholas Jankowski <nrjank>
Submitted:  Fri 23 Oct 2015 10:14:49 PM UTC
 
Category:  Documentation Severity:  3 - Normal
Priority:  5 - Normal Item Group:  Documentation
Status:  Fixed Assigned to:  None
Originator Name:  Nicholas Jankowski Open/Closed:  * Closed
Release:  * 4.0.0 Operating System:  * Microsoft Windows
* Mandatory Fields

Add a New Comment (Rich Markup)
   

Comment Type & Canned Response:
       

 

( Jump to the original submission )

Mon 26 Oct 2015 04:19:47 PM UTC, comment #7: 

I fixed both instances of boolean1 which should have been boolean2 on the stable branch (http://hg.savannah.gnu.org/hgweb/octave/rev/4a82f565a669).  Closing report.

Rik <rik5>
Project Administrator
Mon 26 Oct 2015 10:21:34 AM UTC, comment #6: 

I think I have now attached the correct file.
Please delete the wrong one for me.

(file #35298)

Doug Stewart <dastew>
Mon 26 Oct 2015 10:04:05 AM UTC, comment #5: 

oops  I will redo it

Doug Stewart <dastew>
Mon 26 Oct 2015 02:51:46 AM UTC, comment #4: 

@Doug: Did you upload the correct patch?  The one you uploaded was by jwe and it looks to be for some other bug.

Rik <rik5>
Project Administrator
Sat 24 Oct 2015 09:52:53 PM UTC, comment #3: 

I made a patch for this.

(file #35279)

Doug Stewart <dastew>
Sat 24 Oct 2015 08:48:37 PM UTC, comment #2: 

I can play with m-code, I have never gone through the process of preparing a patch. I looked into it a short while back and it seemed I had to be set up for recompiling, which I'm not (running on windows). If I've misread the process, I'm happy to give it another look if you can point me to step 1.

Nicholas Jankowski <nrjank>
Project Member
Sat 24 Oct 2015 07:09:36 PM UTC, comment #1: 

Yes, seems like a fairly obvious typo error.  Can you prepare a patch for doc/interpreter/expr.txi?

Rik <rik5>
Project Administrator
Fri 23 Oct 2015 10:14:49 PM UTC, original submission:  

I believe the second and fifth occurrences of BOOLEAN1(:) should instead say BOOLEAN2(:)

as per:
https://www.gnu.org/software/octave/doc/interpreter/Short_002dcircuit-Boolean-Operators.html

Nicholas Jankowski <nrjank>
Project Member

 

(Note: upload size limit is set to 16384 kB, after insertion of the required escape characters.)

Attach Files:
   
   
Comment:
   

Attached Files
file #35298:  expr.txi.20655.patch added by dastew (943B - text/x-patch)
file #35279:  expr.txi.20649.patch added by dastew (825B - text/x-patch)

 

Depends on the following items: None found

Items that depend on this one: None found

 

Carbon-Copy List
  • -email is unavailable- added by dastew (Updated the item)
  • -email is unavailable- added by rik5 (Posted a comment)
  • -email is unavailable- added by nrjank (Submitted the item)
  •  

    There are 0 votes so far. Votes easily highlight which items people would like to see resolved in priority, independently of the priority of the item set by tracker managers.

    Only project members can vote.

     

     

     

     

    Follow 5 latest changes.

    Date Changed by Updated Field Previous Value => Replaced by
    2015-10-26 rik5 Open/ClosedOpen Closed
    2015-10-26 rik5 StatusConfirmed Fixed
    2015-10-26 dastew Attached File- Added expr.txi.20655.patch, #35298
    2015-10-24 dastew Attached File- Added expr.txi.20649.patch, #35279
    2015-10-24 rik5 StatusNone Confirmed

    Back to the top


    Powered by Savane 3.9