(
Jump to the original submission)
Mon 26 Oct 2015 04:19:47 PM UTC, comment #7:
I fixed both instances of boolean1 which should have been boolean2 on the stable branch (http://hg.savannah.gnu.org/hgweb/octave/rev/4a82f565a669). Closing report.
|
Mon 26 Oct 2015 10:21:34 AM UTC, comment #6:
I think I have now attached the correct file.
Please delete the wrong one for me.
(file #35298)
|
Mon 26 Oct 2015 10:04:05 AM UTC, comment #5:
oops I will redo it
|
Mon 26 Oct 2015 02:51:46 AM UTC, comment #4:
@Doug: Did you upload the correct patch? The one you uploaded was by jwe and it looks to be for some other bug.
|
Sat 24 Oct 2015 09:52:53 PM UTC, comment #3:
I made a patch for this.
(file #35279)
|
Sat 24 Oct 2015 08:48:37 PM UTC, comment #2:
I can play with m-code, I have never gone through the process of preparing a patch. I looked into it a short while back and it seemed I had to be set up for recompiling, which I'm not (running on windows). If I've misread the process, I'm happy to give it another look if you can point me to step 1.
|
Sat 24 Oct 2015 07:09:36 PM UTC, comment #1:
Yes, seems like a fairly obvious typo error. Can you prepare a patch for doc/interpreter/expr.txi?
|
Fri 23 Oct 2015 10:14:49 PM UTC, original submission:
I believe the second and fifth occurrences of BOOLEAN1(:) should instead say BOOLEAN2(:)
as per:
https://www.gnu.org/software/octave/doc/interpreter/Short_002dcircuit-Boolean-Operators.html
|
(Note: upload size limit is set to 16384 kB, after insertion of the required
escape characters.)
Attach File(s):
Comment:
Depends on the following items: None found
Items that depend on this one: None found
Follow 5 latest changes.