bugGNU Octave - Bugs: bug #32877, Please add single precision lsode...

 
 

bug #32877: Please add single precision lsode function

Submitter:  Sergey B Kirpichev <skirpichev>
Submitted:  Tue 22 Mar 2011 12:44:09 PM UTC
 
Category:  Interpreter Severity:  1 - Wish
Priority:  3 - Low Item Group:  Feature Request
Status:  Confirmed Assigned to:  None
Originator Name:  Open/Closed:  * Open
Release:  * dev Operating System:  * GNU/Linux
* Mandatory Fields

Add a New Comment (Rich Markup)
   

Comment Type & Canned Response:
       

 

Mon 25 Mar 2019 09:18:27 AM UTC, comment #4: 

As a workaround consider using any ode solver written in m-code, e.g. ode45 :

>> [t, y] = ode45 (@(y_) y_*(1-y_), t=single(linspace(0,10)), single(0.1));
>> class (t)
ans = single
>> class (y)
ans = single

Carlo de Falco <cdf>
Project Member
Sun 24 Mar 2019 03:20:12 AM UTC, comment #3: 

same behavior in 5.1.0

Nicholas Jankowski <nrjank>
Project Member
Thu 08 Dec 2016 04:09:12 AM UTC, comment #2: 

behavior unchanged in 4.2.0

Nicholas Jankowski <nrjank>
Project Member
Thu 24 Mar 2011 05:22:56 AM UTC, comment #1: 

Confirmed in dev sources and downgraded to wishlist.

Jordi GutiƩrrez Hermoso <jordigh>
Project Administrator
Tue 22 Mar 2011 12:44:09 PM UTC, original submission:  

Right now lsode() works only in double precision (regardless of initial data) and uses: libcruft/odepack/dlsode.f

An example:

>> y=lsode(@(y_) y_*(1-y_), single(0.1), t=single(linspace(0,10)));
>> class(y)
ans = double

There is already single precision FORTRAN code (libcruft/odepack/slsode.f), but it's not used.

Sergey B Kirpichev <skirpichev>

 

(Note: upload size limit is set to 16384 kB, after insertion of the required escape characters.)

Attach Files:
   
   
Comment:
   

No files currently attached

 

Depends on the following items: None found

Items that depend on this one: None found

 

Carbon-Copy List
  • -email is unavailable- added by cdf (Posted a comment)
  • -email is unavailable- added by nrjank (Posted a comment)
  • -email is unavailable- added by jordigh (Posted a comment)
  • -email is unavailable- added by skirpichev (Submitted the item)
  •  

    There are 0 votes so far. Votes easily highlight which items people would like to see resolved in priority, independently of the priority of the item set by tracker managers.

    Only project members can vote.

     

     

     

     

    Follow 4 latest changes.

    Date Changed by Updated Field Previous Value => Replaced by
    2011-03-24 jordigh Severity3 - Normal 1 - Wish
        Priority5 - Normal 3 - Low
        StatusNone Confirmed
        Release3.4.0 dev

    Back to the top


    Powered by Savane 3.9