GNU Astronomy Utilities - Tasks: task #16341, Change the notation for surface...
You are not allowed to post comments on this tracker with your current authentication level.
task #16341: Change the notation for surface brightness measurements
Submitter: | Raul Infante-Sainz <infantesainz> | ||
Submitted: | Fri 03 Feb 2023 09:45:13 AM UTC | ||
Should Start On: | Fri 03 Feb 2023 12:00:00 AM UTC | Should be Finished on: | Fri 03 Feb 2023 12:00:00 AM UTC |
Category: | MakeCatalog | Priority: | 5 - Normal |
Item Group: | Enhancement | Status: | None |
Privacy: | Public | Percent Complete: | 100% |
Assigned to: | makhlaghi | Open/Closed: | Closed |
Effort: | 0.00 |
Sun 05 Feb 2023 04:54:54 PM UTC, comment #1: |
Mohammad Akhlaghi <makhlaghi>![]() ![]() |
Fri 03 Feb 2023 09:45:13 AM UTC, original submission:
The measurements that are related to the surface brightness done by MakeCatalog do not follow a good notation and the names are not clear at all. In order to be consistent and more clear, I propose the following changes:
|
Raul Infante-Sainz <infantesainz>![]() |
No files currently attached
Depends on the following items: None found
Items that depend on this one: None found
There are 0 votes so far. Votes easily highlight which items people would like to see resolved in priority, independently of the priority of the item set by tracker managers.
Follow 3 latest changes.
Date | Changed by | Updated Field | Previous Value | => | Replaced by |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2023-02-05 | makhlaghi | Percent Complete | 0% | ![]() |
100% |
Assigned to | None | ![]() |
makhlaghi | ||
Open/Closed | Open | ![]() |
Closed |
Thanks Raul! The changes have been implemented in Commit 1c30d22070 (as part of a larger effort to fix the option names and documentation of almost all MakeCatalog measurement options).
While updating the documentation, I noticed that "delta" is a better suffix than "scatter" for the new name of '--sigclip-mean-sb-err', because "delta" (the name of the greek letter used in the book) is more objective and generic for this special measurement and can cause less confusion.
Thanks again for the good suggestion ;-).