GNU Libtool - Patches: patch #4072, MinGW/MSYS support in ltdl broken...
You are not allowed to post comments on this tracker with your current authentication level.
patch #4072: MinGW/MSYS support in ltdl broken (adds -ldl to LIBS)
Submitter: | Mark Junker <mjscod> | ||
Submitted: | Sun 05 Jun 2005 03:44:58 AM UTC | ||
Category: | None | Priority: | 7 - High |
Status: | None | Privacy: | Public |
Assigned to: | None | Open/Closed: | Open |
Tue 07 Jun 2005 08:21:46 PM UTC, comment #1: |
Ralf Wildenhues <rwild>![]() |
Sun 05 Jun 2005 03:44:58 AM UTC, original submission:
Hi,
|
Mark Junker <mjscod> |
Attached Files
file #8924: ltdl.m4.patch added by mjscod (823B - application/octet-stream - correction for libdl tests in ltdl.m4)
Depends on the following items: None found
Items that depend on this one: None found
CC list is empty
There are 0 votes so far. Votes easily highlight which items people would like to see resolved in priority, independently of the priority of the item set by tracker managers.
Follows 1 latest change.
Date | Changed by | Updated Field | Previous Value | => | Replaced by |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2005-06-05 | mjscod | Attached File | - | ![]() |
Added ltdl.m4.patch, #4688 |
I cannot reproduce nor understand this at all. Libtool support for MinGW is certainly suboptimal (search mailing list archives for recent discussions and open problems), it's not that bad.
First, mingw does have LoadLibrary (loadlibrary.la is provided by libltdl itself!). Over here, -ldl is not added to the link line because it is not found. Second, your patch breaks dlopen support on many decent systems.
Please provide more (much more!) information and show what fails -- the docs state what is interesting. Please state which version you use -- if it's CVS HEAD: you do know what "not stable" means?
Regards,
Ralf