DotGNU Portable.NET - Bugs: bug #4694, Possible BUG [PNET][PNET/C] cannot...
You are not allowed to post comments on this tracker with your current authentication level.
bug #4694: Possible BUG [PNET][PNET/C] cannot declare a function returning a function
Submitter: | James Michael DuPont <mdupont> | ||
Submitted: | Sun 10 Aug 2003 07:11:40 AM UTC | ||
Category: | None | Severity: | 3 - Normal |
Item Group: | None | Status: | Wont Fix |
Privacy: | Public | Assigned to: | None |
Open/Closed: | Closed |
Fri 03 Oct 2003 12:01:03 AM UTC, comment #1: |
Rhys Weatherley <rweather> |
Sun 10 Aug 2003 07:11:40 AM UTC, original submission:
This might not be a bug at all, because it is not meant to be supported,I dont know. Here is some valid c code that does not compile by pnet/C.
|
James Michael DuPont <mdupont> |
No files currently attached
Depends on the following items: None found
Items that depend on this one: None found
CC list is empty
There are 0 votes so far. Votes easily highlight which items people would like to see resolved in priority, independently of the priority of the item set by tracker managers.
Follow 2 latest changes.
Date | Changed by | Updated Field | Previous Value | => | Replaced by |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2003-10-03 | rweather | Status | None | None | |
Open/Closed | Open | None |
Powered by Savane 3.13-02a9.
Corresponding source code
Serious abuse of C syntax - it's a miracle that it works
in gcc. It should be this:
int ((*foo)(float ,int () (float)))(float*);
Unless an actual program can be identified that uses this
form of function declaration, I'll put this this in the
"too hard" basket for now.