GNU TeXmacs - Bugs: bug #38386, detecting maxima does not timeout...
You are not allowed to post comments on this tracker with your current authentication level.
bug #38386: detecting maxima does not timeout and may freeze Texmacs at startup
Submitter: | toutatis <toutatis> | ||
Submitted: | Sat 23 Feb 2013 01:18:03 PM UTC | ||
Category: | None | Priority: | 5 - Normal |
Item Group: | Error | Status: | Postponed |
Privacy: | Public | Assigned to: | vdhoeven |
Originator Name: | Open/Closed: | Open | |
Release: | None | Release: | |
Fixed Release: | None | Fixed Release: | |
Keywords: |
Jump to the original submission
Fri 23 Jun 2017 06:06:24 PM UTC, comment #10: |
Joris van der Hoeven <vdhoeven>![]() ![]() |
Mon 25 Feb 2013 10:11:56 AM UTC, comment #9: Yes, I think we should prevent this situation by putting some timeout in maxima_detect (and maybe elsewhere) and just assume that the program is not installed if the timeout is reached. Let us keep the bug open to remember us the issue.
|
Massimiliano Gubinelli <mgubi>![]() |
Mon 25 Feb 2013 10:09:42 AM UTC, comment #8:
|
toutatis <toutatis> |
Mon 25 Feb 2013 08:26:29 AM UTC, comment #7: Yes, I remarked in one of your previous comments that you wrote
|
Massimiliano Gubinelli <mgubi>![]() |
Mon 25 Feb 2013 08:17:00 AM UTC, comment #6: Hello,
|
toutatis <toutatis> |
Sun 24 Feb 2013 06:52:03 PM UTC, comment #5: OK, Thanks.
|
Philippe Joyez <pjoyez>![]() |
Sun 24 Feb 2013 02:39:34 PM UTC, comment #4:
<<<<<<<< reapply_sent_slots() for widget: simple_widget id: 3
|
toutatis <toutatis> |
Sun 24 Feb 2013 01:00:23 PM UTC, comment #3:
|
Philippe Joyez <pjoyez>![]() |
Sat 23 Feb 2013 06:17:23 PM UTC, comment #2:
|
toutatis <toutatis> |
Sat 23 Feb 2013 03:32:53 PM UTC, comment #1: Hello,
|
Philippe Joyez <pjoyez>![]() |
Sat 23 Feb 2013 01:18:03 PM UTC, original submission:
on slackware64-current
|
toutatis <toutatis> |
No files currently attached
Depends on the following items: None found
Items that depend on this one: None found
There are 0 votes so far. Votes easily highlight which items people would like to see resolved in priority, independently of the priority of the item set by tracker managers.
I do not think that I did anything to fix this issue yet.