GNU Octave - Tasks: task #13313, MingW issues for Octave built w...
You are not allowed to post comments on this tracker with your current authentication level.
task #13313: MingW issues for Octave built w --enable-64
Submitter: | Philip Nienhuis <philipnienhuis> | ||
Submitted: | Fri 05 Sep 2014 07:43:25 PM UTC | ||
Should Start On: | Thu 04 Sep 2014 10:00:00 PM UTC | Should be Finished on: | Thu 04 Sep 2014 10:00:00 PM UTC |
Category: | None | Priority: | 5 - Normal |
Status: | None | Privacy: | Public |
Assigned to: | None | Originator Name: | Philip Nienhuis |
Open/Closed: | Closed | Fixed Release: | None |
Planned Release: | None |
Discussion locked!
( Jump to the original submission )
Sat 06 Aug 2022 10:46:22 AM UTC, comment #10: |
Philip Nienhuis <philipnienhuis>![]() |
Sat 10 Oct 2015 07:03:40 PM UTC, comment #9: Can this task be closed now?
|
Philip Nienhuis <philipnienhuis>![]() |
Sun 05 Oct 2014 02:53:22 PM UTC, comment #8: I checked in the following changeset. It seems to fix the strange problem with the loop counter in the eig.cc tests.
|
John W. Eaton <jwe>![]() |
Thu 11 Sep 2014 01:44:25 PM UTC, comment #7: Sorry I didn't initially understand what you meant with "out of range inside the test function itself".
|
Philip Nienhuis <philipnienhuis>![]() |
Sun 07 Sep 2014 02:49:22 PM UTC, comment #6: I suppose people would want 64-bit Octave with 64-bit indexing. Isn't that the point of 64-bit?
|
Philip Nienhuis <philipnienhuis>![]() |
Sun 07 Sep 2014 10:52:42 AM UTC, comment #5: I checked in the following change
|
John W. Eaton <jwe>![]() |
Fri 05 Sep 2014 09:16:09 PM UTC, comment #4: The improved speed you see might just be that w64 is better than w32.
|
John W. Eaton <jwe>![]() |
Fri 05 Sep 2014 08:46:20 PM UTC, comment #3: (I posted this all in the Task tracker as I suppose 64-bit builds do not have a relatively high priority at present.)
|
Philip Nienhuis <philipnienhuis>![]() |
Fri 05 Sep 2014 08:39:12 PM UTC, comment #2: It is not a complaint from my side, not quite. Maybe from Windows...
|
Philip Nienhuis <philipnienhuis>![]() |
Fri 05 Sep 2014 07:54:31 PM UTC, comment #1: 64-bit pointers are required for building Octave with --enable-64, so it makes no sense to complain that Octave configured this way won't run on Windows 32. |
John W. Eaton <jwe>![]() |
Fri 05 Sep 2014 07:43:25 PM UTC, original submission:
General
|
Philip Nienhuis <philipnienhuis>![]() |
No files currently attached
Depends on the following items: None found
Items that depend on this one: None found
There are 0 votes so far. Votes easily highlight which items people would like to see resolved in priority, independently of the priority of the item set by tracker managers.
Follow 2 latest changes.
Date | Changed by | Updated Field | Previous Value | => | Replaced by |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2022-08-06 | philipnienhuis | Open/Closed | Open | ![]() |
Closed |
Discussion Lock | Unlocked | ![]() |
Locked |
Almost 8 years and many successfull 64-bit builds later I think this task had better be closed :-)