Transport Sample Protocol - Tasks: task #8392, Implement message passing in...
You are not allowed to post comments on this tracker with your current authentication level.
task #8392: Implement message passing in kernel Blackboard
Submitter: | Jerome Arbez-Gindre <jaggy> | ||
Submitted: | Wed 09 Jul 2008 03:50:18 PM UTC | ||
Category: | None | Should Start On: | Wed 09 Jul 2008 12:00:00 AM UTC |
Should be Finished on: | Wed 09 Jul 2008 12:00:00 AM UTC | Priority: | 5 - Normal |
Status: | Done | Privacy: | Public |
Assigned to: | jaggy | Percent Complete: | 100% |
Open/Closed: | Open | Effort: | 0.00 |
Jump to the original submission
Fri 11 Jul 2008 06:33:03 PM UTC, comment #14: |
Eric NOULARD <erk> |
Fri 11 Jul 2008 04:28:47 PM UTC, comment #13:
|
Frederik Deweerdt <deweerdt> |
Fri 11 Jul 2008 04:26:30 PM UTC, comment #12: the file
|
Jerome Arbez-Gindre <jaggy> |
Fri 11 Jul 2008 09:51:12 AM UTC, comment #11: I think we should discuss this face-to-face
|
Eric NOULARD <erk> |
Fri 11 Jul 2008 09:28:52 AM UTC, comment #10: To implement the callback mechanism, I need to add data in the S_BB structure.
|
Jerome Arbez-Gindre <jaggy> |
Fri 11 Jul 2008 08:49:42 AM UTC, comment #9: Yep, it is basically the same thing, its just more convenient to have the message recieve as a callback on the kernel side. |
Frederik Deweerdt <deweerdt> |
Fri 11 Jul 2008 08:45:55 AM UTC, comment #8: OK I think I understand the need.
|
Eric NOULARD <erk> |
Thu 10 Jul 2008 12:34:15 PM UTC, comment #7: comment #5 response:
|
Jerome Arbez-Gindre <jaggy> |
Thu 10 Jul 2008 12:07:40 PM UTC, comment #6: If your need is a kind of user/kernel RPC then
|
Eric NOULARD <erk> |
Thu 10 Jul 2008 11:54:18 AM UTC, comment #5:
|
Eric NOULARD <erk> |
Thu 10 Jul 2008 08:08:43 AM UTC, comment #4:
|
Jerome Arbez-Gindre <jaggy> |
Wed 09 Jul 2008 05:02:02 PM UTC, comment #3:
|
Eric NOULARD <erk> |
Wed 09 Jul 2008 04:28:45 PM UTC, comment #2: What do you mean by "message passing"?
|
Eric NOULARD <erk> |
Wed 09 Jul 2008 04:26:13 PM UTC, comment #1: I would like too discuss a way to improve msg passing API:
|
Jerome Arbez-Gindre <jaggy> |
Wed 09 Jul 2008 03:50:18 PM UTC, original submission:
At this time no message passing is implemented in the kernel BB.
|
Jerome Arbez-Gindre <jaggy> |
Depends on the following items: None found
Items that depend on this one: None found
There are 0 votes so far. Votes easily highlight which items people would like to see resolved in priority, independently of the priority of the item set by tracker managers.
Follow 3 latest changes.
Date | Changed by | Updated Field | Previous Value | => | Replaced by |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2008-07-23 | jaggy | Status | In Progress | Done | |
Percent Complete | 0% | 100% | |||
2008-07-11 | jaggy | Attached File | - | Added BB_shared.patch, #16104 |
Powered by Savane 3.13-aa77.
Corresponding source code
I'm OK with this too.
B_BLACKBOARD_SEPARATE_SHARED for "apparently more" intrusive implementation
LOCAL_DATA concept in main.
GO ahead.