GNU nano - Patches: patch #10003, Improve asm syntax highlighting
You are not allowed to post comments on this tracker with your current authentication level.
patch #10003: Improve asm syntax highlighting
Submitter: | easyaspi314 <easyaspi314> | ||
Submitted: | Wed 16 Dec 2020 04:58:30 PM UTC | ||
Priority: | 3 - Low | Status: | None |
Privacy: | Public | Assigned to: | None |
Open/Closed: | Open | Release: | None |
Sat 19 Dec 2020 04:06:06 PM UTC, comment #2: |
easyaspi314 <easyaspi314> |
Fri 18 Dec 2020 04:16:22 PM UTC, comment #1: Thanks for the patch. But... the commit message is incomprehensible. There seem to be two or three levels of bulleted lists. If so, then please use different bullets for the different levels, and use a blank line between the top-evel items, because now I cannot make sense of it. But maybe all these levels are just sloppy formatting?
|
Benno Schulenberg <bens>![]() |
Wed 16 Dec 2020 04:58:30 PM UTC, original submission:
- "Magic" comment detection detects most comment syntaxes while avoiding highlighting things where they shouldn't.
|
easyaspi314 <easyaspi314> |
Depends on the following items: None found
Items that depend on this one: None found
There are 0 votes so far. Votes easily highlight which items people would like to see resolved in priority, independently of the priority of the item set by tracker managers.
Follows 1 latest change.
Date | Changed by | Updated Field | Previous Value | => | Replaced by |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2020-12-16 | easyaspi314 | Attached File | - | ![]() |
Added 0001-Improve-asm-syntax-highlighting.patch, #50490 |
I found a few issues myself regarding CPP macros. I will try again at a later date.
And nothing is going to be perfect as there is no way to tell what assembly syntax this is.
This would be much easier with lookaheads.