newsLibreDWG - News: Revealing unknown DWG classes (2)

Latest News
libredwg-0.6 released [alpha] posted by reini_urban, Mon 13 Aug 2018 09:48:15 AM UTC - 0 replies
Revealing unknown DWG classes (2) posted by reini_urban, Fri 27 Jul 2018 09:55:16 AM UTC - 0 replies
Revealing unknown DWG classes posted by reini_urban, Fri 13 Jul 2018 10:11:01 PM UTC - 0 replies
libredwg-0.5 released [alpha] posted by reini_urban, Thu 05 Jul 2018 05:35:24 AM UTC - 0 replies
Major speedup for big DWG's posted by reini_urban, Mon 11 Jun 2018 06:15:49 PM UTC - 0 replies
[Submit News]
[8 news in archive]

Revealing unknown DWG classes (2)

Item posted by Reini Urban <reini_urban> on Fri 27 Jul 2018 09:55:16 AM UTC.

I've added more solver code and a more detailled explanation to the HACKING file, to find the binary layout of unknown DWG classes, in reference to public docs and generated DXF files. See for the first part.

So this is now the real AI part of examples/unknown. I've added the spec of the following classes in the meantime, in various states of completeness:
Many more are in work, as with the picat solver and backtracker I can now create the most promising solutions at scale.

There's a lot of code related to examples/unknown to automatically
find the field layout of yet unknown classes. At first you need
DWG/DXF pairs of unknown entities or objects and put them into
test/test-data/. At creation take care to create uniquely identifiable
names and numbers, not to create DXF fields all with the same value 0.
Then you'll never known which field in the DWG is which.

Then run make -C examples regen-unknown, which does this:

run ./ to create -v5 logfiles with the binary blobs for all
UNKNOWN_OBJ and UNKNOWN_ENT instances in those DWG's.

Then the perl script creates the include file adding all those blobs.

The next perl script parses and looks
for matching DXF files, and creates the 3 include files
with the matching blob data from, with the
matching field types and values from the DXF and to
workaround some static initialization issues in the C file.

Next run make unknown, which does this:

Compiles and runs examples/unknown, which creates for a every string
value in the DXF some bits representations and tries to find them in
the UNKNOWN blobs. If it doesn't find them, either the string-to-bit
conversion lost too much precision to be able to find them, esp. with
doubles, or we have a different problem. make unknown creates a big
log file unknown-`git describe`.log in which you can see the
individual statistics and initial layout guesses.

possible: [34433333344443333334444333333311xxxxxxxxxx3443333...
11 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 11 1]

The x stands for a fixed field, the numbers and a dot for the number
of variants this bit is used for (the dot for >9) and a space means
this is a hole for a field which is not represented as DXF field, i.e.
a FIELD_*(name, 0) in the dwg.spec with DXF group code 0.

unknown also creates picat data files in examples/ which are then used with
picat from to enhance the search for the best layout
guess for each particular class. picat is a nice mix of a functional
programming tool with an optional constraint solver. The first part in
the picat process does almost the same as unknown.c, finding the fixed
layout, possible variants and holes in a straight-forward functional
fashion. This language is very similar to erlang, untyped haskell or prolog.
The second optimization part of picat uses a solver with
constraints to improve the layout of the found variants and holes to
find the best guess for the needed dwg.spec layout.
Note that picat list and array indices are one-based, so you need to
subtract 1 from each found offset. 1-32 mean the bits 0-31.

The field names are filled in by examples/ automatically.
We could parse dwg.spec for this, but for now I went with a manual solution,
as the number of unknown classes gets less, not more.

E.g. for ACAD_EVALUATION_GRAPH.pi with a high percentage from the above
possible layout, it currently produces this:

Definite result:
HOLE([1,32],01000000010100000001010000000110) len = 32
FIELD_BL (edge_flags, 93); // 32 [33,42]
HOLE([43,52],0100000001) len = 10
FIELD_BL (node_edge1, 92); // -1 [53,86]
FIELD_BL (node_edge2, 92); // -1 [87,120]
FIELD_BL (node_edge3, 92); // -1 [121,154]
FIELD_BL (node_edge4, 92); // -1 [155,188]
HOLE([189,191],100) len = 3
FIELD_H (parenthandle, 330); // 6.0.0 [192,199]
FIELD_H (evalexpr, 360); // 3.2.2E2 [200,223]
HOLE([224,230],1100111) len = 7
Todo: 32 + 178 = 210, Missing: 20
FIELD_BL (has_graph, 96); // 1 0100000001 [[1,10],[11,20],[21,30],[43,52]]
FIELD_BL (unknown1, 97); // 1 0100000001 [[1,10],[11,20],[21,30],[43,52]]
FIELD_BL (nodeid, 91); // 0 10 [[2,3],[10,11],[12,13],[20,21],[22,23],[31,32],[44,45],[52,53],[189,190],[225,226]]
FIELD_BL (num_evalexpr, 95); // 1 0100000001 [[1,10],[11,20],[21,30],[43,52]]

The next picat steps do automate the following reasoning:

The first hole 1-32 is filled by the 3 1 values from BL96, BL97 and
BL95, followed by the 0 value from BL91. The second hole is clearly
another unknown BL with value 1. The third hole at 189-191
is padding before the handle stream, and can be ignored. This is from
a r2010 file, which has seperate handle and text streams. The last
hole 224-230 could theoretically hold almost another unknown handle, but
practically it's also just padding. The last handles are always optional
reactors and the xdicobject handle for objects, and 7 bits is not enough
for a handle value. A code 4 null-handle would be 01000000.

You start by finding the DXF documentation and the ObjectARX header
file of the class, to get the names and description of the class.

You add the names and types to dwg.h and dwg.spec, change the class
type in to DEBUGGING or UNTESTED. With DEBUGGING add the
-DDEBUG_CLASSES flag to CFLAGS in src/Makefile and test the dwg's with
programs/dwgread -v4. Some layouts are version dependent, some need
a REPEAT loop or vector with a num_field field.

The picat constraints module examples/unknown.pi is still being worked
and is getting better and better identifying all missing classes
automatically. The problem with AutoCAD DWG's is that everybody can
add their own custom classes as ObjectARX application, and that
reverse-engineering them never stops. So it has to be automated somehow.

No messages in Revealing unknown DWG classes (2)


Back to the top

Powered by Savane 3.3