newsGuile - News: GNU Guile 2.0.13 released

 
 
Latest News
GNU Guile 2.0.13 released [security fixes] posted by cwebber, Wed Oct 12 12:56:00 2016 - 0 replies
GNU Guile 2.1.4 released (beta) posted by wingo, Wed Sep 14 10:10:06 2016 - 0 replies
GNU Guile 2.0.12 released posted by wingo, Thu Jul 14 20:36:00 2016 - 0 replies
GNU Guile 2.1.3 released (beta) posted by wingo, Sun Jun 19 09:53:01 2016 - 0 replies
GNU Guile 2.1.2 released (beta) posted by wingo, Wed Feb 3 16:42:32 2016 - 0 replies
[Submit News]
[40 news in archive]

GNU Guile 2.0.13 released [security fixes]

Item posted by Christopher Allan Webber <cwebber> on Wed Oct 12 12:56:00 2016.

We've just released a new version of GNU Guile, version 2.0.13, which is a security release for Guile (see the original announcement).

This handles a significant security vulnerability affecting the live REPL, CVE-2016-8606. Due to the nature of this bug, Guile applications themselves in general aren't vulnerable, but Guile developers are. Arbitrary Scheme code may be used to attack your system in this scenario. (A more minor security issue is also addressed, CVE-2016-8605.)

There is also a lesson here that applies beyond Guile: the presumption that "localhost" is only accessible by local users can't be guaranteed by modern operating system environments. If you are looking to provide local-execution-only, we recommend using Unix domain sockets or named pipes. Don't rely on localhost plus some port.

To give context, Guile supports a nice live-hacking feature where a user can expose a REPL to connect to, through Geiser or so on. This allows Guile users to hack programs even while programs are running.

When using the live hacking feature, the default in Guile has been to expose a port over localhost to which code may be passed. The assumption for this is that only a local user may write to localhost, so it should be safe. Unfortunately, users simultaneously developing Guile and operating modern browsers are vulnerable to a combination of an HTML form protocol attack and a DNS rebinding attack. How to combine these attacks is published in the article How to steal any developer's local database.

In Guile's case, the general idea is that you visit some site which presumably loads some JavaScript code (or tricks the developer into pressing a button which performs a POST), and the site operator switches the DNS from their own IP to 127.0.0.1. Then a POST is done from the website to 127.0.0.1 with the body containing Scheme code. This code is then executed by the Guile interpreter on the listening port.

The version we are releasing mitigates this problem by detecting incoming HTTP connections and closing them before executing any code.

However, there is a better long term solution, which is already available even to users of older versions of Guile: Guile supports Unix domain sockets in POSIX environments. For example, users may run the command:

to open and listen to a socket at /tmp/guile-socket. Geiser users may then connect using M-x geiser-connect-local. This is considerably safer.

We hope that other program authors take heed of this lesson as well: many programs make use of localhost + port as a way of limiting connections. Unfortunately, in today's complex networked environment, this isn't a safe assumption. It's very difficult to predict what programs may provide a way of chaining requests to an application listening on localhost, and certainly difficult on a system where web browsers are involved. Take heed!

(This post originally appeared on the guile-users mailing list.)

Comments:

No messages in GNU Guile 2.0.13 released [security fixes]

 

Back to the top


Powered by Savane 3.1-cleanup1