GNU Health - Bugs: bug #40767, Freetext ICD-10 references as URIs...
You are not allowed to post comments on this tracker with your current authentication level.
bug #40767: Freetext ICD-10 references as URIs (e.g. icd10:A01)
Submitter: | Wes Turner <westurner> | ||
Submitted: | Sun 01 Dec 2013 12:36:11 PM UTC | ||
Category: | None | Severity: | 3 - Normal |
Item Group: | None | Status: | Invalid |
Privacy: | Public | Assigned to: | None |
Open/Closed: | Closed | Release: | None |
Module: | health | Component: | None |
Mon 27 Apr 2015 02:24:57 AM UTC, comment #1: |
Chris Zimmerman <teffalump> |
Sun 01 Dec 2013 12:36:11 PM UTC, original submission:
For reporting/registries/textual analysis, it may be useful to add guidance regarding the use of URIs to reference structured data items like ICD10 codes.
|
Wes Turner <westurner> |
No files currently attached
Depends on the following items: None found
Items that depend on this one: None found
Carbon-Copy List
There are 0 votes so far. Votes easily highlight which items people would like to see resolved in priority, independently of the priority of the item set by tracker managers.
Follow 2 latest changes.
Date | Changed by | Updated Field | Previous Value | => | Replaced by |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2015-04-27 | teffalump | Status | None | Invalid | |
Open/Closed | Open | Closed |
Powered by Savane 3.13-02a9.
Corresponding source code
I'm a little confused what this means. I don't think the icd10 package uses URIs like that... or is this report an enhancement request? We try to use robust standards - icd10pcs, icd10, fhir, etc. which I think the author is trying to get at. I agree that using known coding systems is important, and we do that in, for example, fhir when icd10 codes are preferred. I'm going to close and mark as invalid, since we've already done work on this topic and it's not a bug.