GNU nano - Bugs: bug #24730, syntax coloring + slowness since...
You are not allowed to post comments on this tracker with your current authentication level.
bug #24730: syntax coloring + slowness since 2.0.0
Submitter: | Dustin Howett <dhowett> | ||
Submitted: | Sun 02 Nov 2008 04:27:37 PM UTC | ||
Severity: | 3 - Normal | Status: | Fixed |
Assigned to: | astyanax | Open/Closed: | Closed |
Jump to the original submission
Sat 09 Jan 2016 04:34:09 PM UTC, comment #9: |
Benno Schulenberg <bens> |
Wed 03 Jun 2015 11:45:22 AM UTC, comment #8: Is there still any perceived slowness with nano 2.2.6 or 2.4.1 or later? If so, please be specific about which syntax you use and which file you are editing. If possible, use one of the src/*.c files from nano itself for testing.
|
Benno Schulenberg <bens> |
Wed 10 Feb 2010 06:21:45 PM UTC, comment #7: Really, I did not observe this at all; then again nano's source files are a few thousand lines each. Can you tell me which syntax you are using to observe this? |
Chris Allegretta <astyanax> |
Wed 10 Feb 2010 12:08:18 AM UTC, comment #6: I experience this problem on various systems faster than 1.0GHz (2.0 GHz, 2.8GHz, with varying numbers of cores;) all systems I'm experiencing this sluggishness on have 4GB of RAM (typically 2-3.5GB available when editing.) with the 2.2 series. |
Dustin Howett <dhowett> |
Mon 08 Feb 2010 07:21:25 PM UTC, comment #5: Hello,
|
Chris Allegretta <astyanax> |
Tue 02 Feb 2010 07:07:45 PM UTC, comment #4: Is there any progress on this bug? It's still present as of version 2.2.2 (debian squeeze version), and it makes editing large source files a real pain.
|
Anonymous |
Sat 07 Feb 2009 01:41:19 AM UTC, comment #3: I've been working on this the past week or two, if you are interested in testing out what I have implemented so far and have subversion access let me know. Alternatively if you dont have subversion access but are interested in testing I can create a prerelease tarball for you. Otherwise you should see hopefully see improvement as of 2.1.8 which should be released within a week. |
Chris Allegretta <astyanax> |
Fri 19 Dec 2008 11:46:15 AM UTC, comment #2: Just a "me too", I've found nano to be extremely slow with syntax highlighting in general in the 2.x releases. Large files are very slow, it is the same for small files as well however their small size makes it (almost) un-noticable. |
Anonymous |
Sun 02 Nov 2008 04:29:35 PM UTC, comment #1: nano --version:
|
Dustin Howett <dhowett> |
Sun 02 Nov 2008 04:27:37 PM UTC, original submission:
Since nano 2.0.0 was released, using syntax highlighting on large files has been slow. This bug was not present in 1.3.12; now when I edit a few characters on a line or even cut a line in a large C file (for example) the characters disappear very slowly.
|
Dustin Howett <dhowett> |
No files currently attached
Depends on the following items: None found
Items that depend on this one: None found
There are 0 votes so far. Votes easily highlight which items people would like to see resolved in priority, independently of the priority of the item set by tracker managers.
Follow 6 latest changes.
Date | Changed by | Updated Field | Previous Value | => | Replaced by |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2016-01-09 | bens | Status | In Progress | Fixed | |
Open/Closed | Open | Closed | |||
2015-06-03 | bens | Summary | Syntax Coloring + Slowness since 2.x | syntax coloring + slowness since 2.0.0 | |
2009-02-07 | astyanax | Status | None | In Progress | |
Assigned to | None | astyanax | |||
2008-11-02 | dhowett | Carbon-Copy | - | Added -email is unavailable- |
Powered by Savane 3.13-02a9.
Corresponding source code
I think this has been fully fixed with the recent changes to reset_multis(). If you still experience any sluggishness with 2.5.0 or the upcoming 2.5.1, please open a new bug.