GNU gv - Bugs: bug #41737, Is `gv -grayscale` meaning...
You are not allowed to post comments on this tracker with your current authentication level.
bug #41737: Is `gv -grayscale` meaning reverted?
Submitter: | Victor Porton <porton> | ||
Submitted: | Fri 28 Feb 2014 09:25:07 PM UTC | ||
Category: | PostScript rendering | Severity: | 3 - Normal |
Item Group: | None | Status: | None |
Privacy: | Public | Assigned to: | None |
Open/Closed: | Open | Release: | None |
Sun 02 Mar 2014 07:54:03 AM UTC, comment #5: |
William Bader <william8000> |
Fri 28 Feb 2014 09:45:28 PM UTC, comment #4: Please somebody report this bug at http://bugs.ghostscript.com (I've entered there at http://bugs.ghostscript.com/createaccount.cgi my email but received no confirmation email). So I can't access bugs.ghostscript.com service. |
Victor Porton <porton> |
Fri 28 Feb 2014 09:40:48 PM UTC, comment #3: $ pcal 03 2014 > ~/t/cal.ps
Then I printed it in Acrobat Reader with its "Output Mode" setting being "Color" and "High Quality Grayscale". They outputted no gray regions at all or gray regions as VERY fade color which a man would have trouble to read.
But! When I've set Acrobat Reader to "Black Only Grayscale" it printed a high quality page with all needed degrees of gray.
It seems that we have a trouble with GhostScript confusing different "quality" settings. |
Victor Porton <porton> |
Fri 28 Feb 2014 09:27:30 PM UTC, comment #2: $ gs -version
|
Victor Porton <porton> |
Fri 28 Feb 2014 09:27:04 PM UTC, comment #1: $ gv -version
|
Victor Porton <porton> |
Fri 28 Feb 2014 09:25:07 PM UTC, original submission:
$ pcal 03 2014 | gv -grayscale -
This outputs a colored window (PNG attached), despite of -grayscale argument.
It seems that -grayscale meaning is reverted. (Without -grayscale flag it looks like grayscale). |
Victor Porton <porton> |
Depends on the following items: None found
Items that depend on this one: None found
There are 0 votes so far. Votes easily highlight which items people would like to see resolved in priority, independently of the priority of the item set by tracker managers.
I posted to http://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=695081