GNU TeXmacs - Support: sr #110067, Question
You are not allowed to post comments on this tracker with your current authentication level.
sr #110067: Question
Submitter: | mariano estevez <estevezma> | ||
Submitted: | Mon 21 Oct 2019 08:46:57 PM UTC | ||
Category: | None | Priority: | 5 - Normal |
Severity: | 3 - Normal | Status: | Wont Do |
Privacy: | Public | Assigned to: | vdhoeven |
Open/Closed: | Closed | Operating System: | None |
Sun 22 Nov 2020 03:40:50 PM UTC, comment #1: |
Joris van der Hoeven <vdhoeven> |
Mon 21 Oct 2019 08:46:57 PM UTC, original submission:
Hi: texmacs with guile-2.0? Thanks |
mariano estevez <estevezma> |
No files currently attached
Depends on the following items: None found
Items that depend on this one: None found
Carbon-Copy List
There are 0 votes so far. Votes easily highlight which items people would like to see resolved in priority, independently of the priority of the item set by tracker managers.
Follow 3 latest changes.
Date | Changed by | Updated Field | Previous Value | => | Replaced by |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2020-11-22 | vdhoeven | Status | None | Wont Do | |
Assigned to | None | vdhoeven | |||
Open/Closed | Open | Closed |
Powered by Savane 3.13-02a9.
Corresponding source code
please be aware that Guile 1 and Guile 2 carry the same name, but that resemblances very much end there: Guile 2 has a completely different design, which breaks the interface with TeXmacs. Porting our interface to Guile 2 requires a lot of work and it is possible that this will never be done. Since Guile 1 is no longer supported by many standard Linux distributions, recent versions of TeXmacs directly include Guile 1. We will continue to do so until we find time to switch to a more recent version of Guile or to another Scheme implementation.