GNU TeXmacs - Bugs: bug #42455, TeXmacs is slow
You are not allowed to post comments on this tracker with your current authentication level.
bug #42455: TeXmacs is slow
Submitter: | Victor Porton <porton> | ||
Submitted: | Wed 28 May 2014 09:27:12 PM UTC | ||
Category: | Editor | Priority: | 7 - High |
Item Group: | Error | Status: | Confirmed |
Privacy: | Public | Assigned to: | vdhoeven |
Originator Name: | Open/Closed: | Open | |
Release: | None | Release: | |
Fixed Release: | None | Fixed Release: | |
Keywords: |
Jump to the original submission
Thu 03 Jul 2014 07:17:26 AM UTC, comment #8: |
Francois Poulain <fpoulain>![]() |
Wed 02 Jul 2014 02:11:41 PM UTC, comment #7: Here is Youjun's document which highlight r2655's regression.
|
Francois Poulain <fpoulain>![]() |
Wed 02 Jul 2014 12:20:18 PM UTC, comment #6: Fyi, I made tests with the document given by Youjun Hu, in the following email:
|
Francois Poulain <fpoulain>![]() |
Wed 02 Jul 2014 12:16:41 PM UTC, comment #5: I spent many hours for searching another performance regression; and it was rewarding.
|
Francois Poulain <fpoulain>![]() |
Tue 01 Jul 2014 08:27:41 AM UTC, comment #4: Here is a patch for reverting r8087. |
Francois Poulain <fpoulain>![]() |
Mon 30 Jun 2014 09:10:06 AM UTC, comment #3: I meant processing big document, not bug. :) |
Francois Poulain <fpoulain>![]() |
Fri 27 Jun 2014 01:58:22 PM UTC, comment #2: I made some tests on big a document on different versions of TeXmacs since 2012.
|
Francois Poulain <fpoulain>![]() |
Fri 30 May 2014 08:10:01 AM UTC, comment #1: Although improvements may be done, you are probably interested in splitting large documents. See e.g. http://www.texmacs.org/tmweb/manual/webman-links.en.html#auto-28 for help. |
Francois Poulain <fpoulain>![]() |
Wed 28 May 2014 09:27:12 PM UTC, original submission:
TeXmacs 1.0.7.18 in a Debian Linux i7 machine is rather slow editing a 16979379 bytes (246 pages) book.
|
Victor Porton <porton> |
Depends on the following items: None found
Items that depend on this one: None found
There are 0 votes so far. Votes easily highlight which items people would like to see resolved in priority, independently of the priority of the item set by tracker managers.
Follow 10 latest changes.
Date | Changed by | Updated Field | Previous Value | => | Replaced by |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2017-12-06 | vdhoeven | Priority | 6 - Bit higher | ![]() |
7 - High |
2015-03-22 | mdbenito | Priority | 5 - Normal | ![]() |
6 - Bit higher |
2014-07-02 | fpoulain | Attached File | - | ![]() |
Added test_bug_42455.tm, #31666 |
2014-07-02 | vdhoeven | Category | None | ![]() |
Editor |
Item Group | None | ![]() |
Error | ||
2014-07-02 | fpoulain | Attached File | - | ![]() |
Added revert_2655.diff, #31661 |
2014-07-01 | fpoulain | Attached File | - | ![]() |
Added revert_8087.diff, #31649 |
2014-06-27 | fpoulain | Status | None | ![]() |
Confirmed |
Assigned to | None | ![]() |
vdhoeven | ||
Release | 1.0.7.18 | ![]() |
Youjun confirmed the performance improvement with the patch "revert_2655.diff".
As far as rev 8087 is concerned, is seems that it take more time to compute the rendering because more things are done : the typesetter recompute the document until references are defined (when possible). This is made in order to compute forward references properly for the first time. In theory, this should not impede computation for "well defined" documents.