GNU Core Utilities - Bugs: bug #16325, Fixes needed to build coreutils on...
You are not allowed to post comments on this tracker with your current authentication level.
bug #16325: Fixes needed to build coreutils on Interix (SFU or SUA)
Submitter: | Matthew Woehlke <woehlkmp> | ||
Submitted: | Tue 11 Apr 2006 06:46:54 PM UTC | ||
Category: | None | Severity: | 3 - Normal |
Item Group: | None | Status: | Fixed |
Privacy: | Public | Assigned to: | None |
Open/Closed: | Closed |
Jump to the original submission
Tue 19 Sep 2006 10:02:45 PM UTC, comment #6: |
Paul Eggert <eggert> |
Mon 17 Apr 2006 02:48:34 PM UTC, comment #5: Unfortunately, Paul's patch broke compilation on cygwin (and I'm assuming Linux, too, since cygwin modeled their statvfs after linux), where struct statvfs does not have an f_type member; only struct statfs:
statvfs.f_type not present.
|
Eric Blake <ericb> |
Wed 12 Apr 2006 08:53:56 PM UTC, comment #4: Unfortunately, msdn.microsoft.com is the most help you're going to get in that department (unless Microsoft is kind enough to fork over their source code, which I doubt). To hazard a guess, however, it looks like they might scan /dev/fs/[A-Z] and simply report on all available drive letters. (And this is getting technical for comments; please e-mail me if you are interested in further discussion).
|
Matthew Woehlke <woehlkmp> |
Wed 12 Apr 2006 08:19:31 PM UTC, comment #3: I installed the attached patch in an attempt to address your points. You'll have to help us out with "however the 'df' that comes with SFU/SUA does it", though; I don't have access to Interix so I can't figure it out for you. |
Paul Eggert <eggert> |
Wed 12 Apr 2006 04:07:57 PM UTC, comment #2: Hmm... "however the 'df' that comes with SFU/SUA does it", I guess. I didn't notice until you said something that the EXTRA_PROGRAMS (which 'df' is one of) are not built unless you do it 'by hand'. Therefore, I think my answer is "who cares, as long as the bin_PROGRAMS all build cleanly".
|
Matthew Woehlke <woehlkmp> |
Wed 12 Apr 2006 09:18:14 AM UTC, comment #1: If we can't read the mount table, how should "df -t" be implemented?
|
James Youngman <jay> |
Tue 11 Apr 2006 06:46:54 PM UTC, original submission:
There are some relatively minor changes needed to build coreutils on Interix (SFU 3.5 or SUA 5.2). Please consider integrating these into the next release:
|
Matthew Woehlke <woehlkmp> |
Depends on the following items: None found
Items that depend on this one: None found
There are 0 votes so far. Votes easily highlight which items people would like to see resolved in priority, independently of the priority of the item set by tracker managers.
Follow 3 latest changes.
Date | Changed by | Updated Field | Previous Value | => | Replaced by |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2006-09-19 | eggert | Status | None | Fixed | |
Open/Closed | Open | Closed | |||
2006-04-12 | eggert | Attached File | - | Added diff.txt, #9773 |
Powered by Savane 3.13-d3ae.
Corresponding source code
These bugs all seem to be fixed now in CVS, except perhaps for the bit about the mount table, and you can open a new bug for that once you figure out how the mount table works there, or how to port the code, or something like that.