GNU Astronomy Utilities - Bugs: bug #65195, CosmicCalculator prevents non-flat...
You are not allowed to post comments on this tracker with your current authentication level.
bug #65195: CosmicCalculator prevents non-flat FLRW calculations; angular diam dist only on flat
Submitter: | Boud Roukema <boud> | ||
Submitted: | Tue 23 Jan 2024 06:26:13 PM UTC | ||
Category: | CosmicCalculator | Severity: | 3 - Normal |
Item Group: | Output not reasonable | Status: | Fixed |
Privacy: | Public | Assigned to: | boud |
Open/Closed: | Closed |
Sun 04 Feb 2024 05:06:46 PM UTC, comment #3: |
Mohammad Akhlaghi <makhlaghi> |
Sun 04 Feb 2024 04:27:47 PM UTC, comment #2:
|
Boud Roukema <boud> |
Fri 02 Feb 2024 05:27:42 PM UTC, comment #1: Thanks a lot Boud for catching this important point! Your commit (with cosmetic modifications as you will see) is now in the 'master' branch as Commit 5a6cf1d15.
|
Mohammad Akhlaghi <makhlaghi> |
Tue 23 Jan 2024 06:26:13 PM UTC, original submission:
Commit 4aca51a7 prevents non-flat FLRW calculations (for curvature density parameter values greater than 1e-8 in absolute value). Although LCDM is flat by definition, there's not much point excluding non-flat models for general cosmological analysis (e.g. [1]).
|
Boud Roukema <boud> |
No files currently attached
Depends on the following items: None found
Items that depend on this one: None found
There are 0 votes so far. Votes easily highlight which items people would like to see resolved in priority, independently of the priority of the item set by tracker managers.
Follow 4 latest changes.
Date | Changed by | Updated Field | Previous Value | => | Replaced by |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024-02-02 | makhlaghi | Status | None | Fixed | |
Assigned to | None | boud | |||
Open/Closed | Open | Closed | |||
Summary | CosmicCalculator prevents non-flat FLRW calculations; angular diam dist is generically wrong | CosmicCalculator prevents non-flat FLRW calculations; angular diam dist only on flat |
Powered by Savane 3.13-caa5.
Corresponding source code
Great! Thanks a lot Boud :-).