Unifont - Support: sr #109546, Many Language Alphabets are not...
You are not allowed to post comments on this tracker with your current authentication level.
sr #109546: Many Language Alphabets are not there.
Submitter: | Daryl Rhoades <gilgalad> | ||
Submitted: | Sun 26 Aug 2018 07:41:26 AM UTC | ||
Category: | None | Priority: | 5 - Normal |
Severity: | 3 - Normal | Status: | None |
Privacy: | Public | Assigned to: | unifoundry |
Open/Closed: | Closed | Operating System: | Microsoft Windows |
Sun 09 Dec 2018 12:43:40 AM UTC, comment #4: |
Paul Hardy <unifoundry> |
Sat 01 Sep 2018 05:10:42 PM UTC, comment #3: Daryl,
|
Paul Hardy <unifoundry> |
Wed 29 Aug 2018 06:46:49 PM UTC, comment #2: Thanks a lot for the response. I didn't realize that Unifont is a two font set. As such I labeled them on my website as Unifont (lower), Unifont(upper). So that people using the keyboard know which font to use or switch to.
|
Daryl Rhoades <gilgalad> |
Sun 26 Aug 2018 02:55:23 PM UTC, comment #1: Daryl,
|
Paul Hardy <unifoundry> |
Sun 26 Aug 2018 07:41:26 AM UTC, original submission:
I downloaded Unifont, the latest version unifont-11.0.02.ttf. All the fonts for Nabataean, Sogdian, Old Sogdian and many others do not display in any browser or word processing document when the Unifont is selected. The version I have supports a lot of alphabet sets, but not any of the newer ones.
|
Daryl Rhoades <gilgalad> |
No files currently attached
Depends on the following items: None found
Items that depend on this one: None found
There are 0 votes so far. Votes easily highlight which items people would like to see resolved in priority, independently of the priority of the item set by tracker managers.
Follow 2 latest changes.
Date | Changed by | Updated Field | Previous Value | => | Replaced by |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2018-12-09 | unifoundry | Assigned to | None | unifoundry | |
Open/Closed | Open | Closed |
Powered by Savane 3.13-4448.
Corresponding source code
Daryl,
I have not heard from you following my September 1st post, so I am hoping that you understand the limitations of Unifont and its binding to the Unicode Standard. In your case, you would benefit most from a full OpenType font that provides alternate glyphs for the same character, which is beyond the capabilities of Unifont.
I also hope that the pointers I gave you to those who submitted Unicode proposals for the scripts that you use were helpful.
As I do not think there is anything more I can do on this with Unifont (given how limited its construction is), I am closing this entry. Thank you for reaching out to me though, and hopefully the information I provided has helped.
Sincerely,
Paul Hardy