Wed 02 Aug 2017 01:37:18 AM UTC, original submission:
U+090D DEVANAGARI LETTER CANDRA E, U+0911 DEVANAGARI LETTER CANDRA O, U+0945 DEVANAGARI VOWEL SIGN CANDRA E, U+0949 DEVANAGARI VOWEL SIGN CANDRA O, U+0955 DEVANAGARI VOWEL SIGN CANDRA LONG E, and U+0972 DEVANAGARI LETTER CANDRA A render the candra differently. My suggested glyphs standardize on that of U+0911, except for U+0955, where I omitted one pixel for clarity.
The vowel signs above (U+093A, U+0945, U+0946, U+0947, U+0948, U+0955) should be aligned with the vertical stroke of most consonants.
The vertical strokes of vowel signs to the right (U+093B, U+093E, U+093F, U+0940, U+0949, U+094A, U+094C, U+094E) should be the same length as the vertical stroke of most consonants.
The headstroke of U+094F DEVANAGARI VOWEL SIGN AW is too low.
U+0971 DEVANAGARI SIGN HIGH SPACING DOT should be at the height of the headstroke. There is no reason for it to be 2 cells wide.
U+0976 DEVANAGARI LETTER UE and U+0977 DEVANAGARI LETTER UUE have an extraneous candra.
There is no reason for U+1CE1 VEDIC TONE ATHARVAVEDIC INDEPENDENT SVARITA, U+1CF2 VEDIC SIGN ARDHAVISARGA, U+1CF3 VEDIC SIGN ROTATED ARDHAVISARGA, and U+1CF7 VEDIC SIGN ATIKRAMA to be combining characters. They overlap their bases illegibly and U+1CF3 is cramped. They should be 1 cell wide and should not have combining.txt entries.
U+A8FA DEVANAGARI CARET is a “zero-advance character centered on the point between two orthographic syllables”; that is, it should be a combining character with an offset of -8. It is also too low: it should balance on the headstroke.
U+A8FB DEVANAGARI HEADSTROKE should not join adjacent headstrokes. This is to make it obvious how many headstrokes there are in a lengthy lacuna.
090D:009800780000FFFF0C300C300C300C300C600400020001800060001000180018
093A:0018001800180018000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
093B:000C000C000C003F000C000C000C000C000C000C000C000C000C000C00040000
093E:000000000000003F000C000C000C000C000C000C000C000C000C000C00040000
093F:3C0062003100FC00300030003000300030003000300030003000300010000000
0940:00F001080108003F000C000C000C000C000C000C000C000C000C000C00040000
0945:004C003C00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
0946:020001F000080000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
0947:00E0001000080000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
0948:00E001D000280000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
0949:0026001E0000003F000C000C000C000C000C000C000C000C000C000C00040000
094A:008000780004003F000C000C000C000C000C000C000C000C000C000C00040000
094B:00F000080004003F000C000C000C000C000C000C000C000C000C000C00040000
094C:00F001E80014003F000C000C000C000C000C000C000C000C000C000C00040000
094E:0000000000003C00300030003000300030003000300030003000300010000000
094F:010400F2000A00FF000600060006000600060006000600060006000600020000
0955:004C0038007C0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
0971:00000018180000000000000000000000
0972:013000F000001CFF2260026006601C60046043E0436027601E60006000200000
0976:0000000000001CFF2260026006601C60046043E0436027601E60002010800F00
0977:0000000000001CFF2260026006601C60046043E027601E6010E00F0020401F80
1CE1:0C1211101010101010101010101010F0
1CF2:000000000000423C003C420000000000
1CF3:00000000000042242424244200000000
1CF7:06081010101010101010101020202000
A8FA:0220014000800000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
A8FB:0000000000003FFC000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
The glyphs of U+0936 DEVANAGARI LETTER SHA and U+096F DEVANAGARI DIGIT NINE are not the usual glyphs. They are not wrong and don’t need changing! I only mention it in case it was unintentional. U+A8E9 COMBINING DEVANAGARI DIGIT NINE is inconsistent with U+096F.
|