Sun 19 Feb 2017 12:55:36 AM UTC, comment #5:
Thank you very much for you contribution for the docs (comment #3). The tutorial is great! I reviewed the text (according to your E-Mail, I assume, we are both Germans) and
- put a bit of my idea of English into your text
- formatted it more texinfo like (@result{}, xref, ...)
- rephrased comparison with features of Matlab (static members) in a neutral way and preserving the information
all hopefully without changing too much of your original work.
I think we are almost done and can commit your work. Two things are left:
1. You agree on my changes (those happened mostly in your tutorial).
2. I don't get the output for one example:
I am using JVM 1.7 or 1.8. Don't really often use it. So can you confirm that this works for you and how can this be made working for me? Otherwise, it can simply be omitted.
Regarding comment #4. I read about your contributions, but like I just said, I don't really use Java a lot to be a good reviewer of the changes and preferred to spend my time on other Octave issues. I propose the following: when we got this item done (and some of you other documentation changes, we start a discussion on the maintainers list next week, where you guide me through your patches and bugfixes and push them to development branch "default" where the don't do too much harm.
(file #39785)
|