bugGNU arch -- a revision control system - Bugs: bug #4918, update and pristine trees

 
 

bug #4918: update and pristine trees

Submitted by:  Tom Lord <tomlord>
Submitted on:  Fri 22 Aug 2003 04:59:24 PM UTC  
 
Category: tlaSeverity: 3 - Normal
Item Group: bugStatus: None
Privacy: PublicOpen/Closed: Feedback
Release: 
Fixed Release: 
Merge Request?: None
Your Archive Name: 
Your Archive Location: 
Assigned to: Tom Lord <tomlord>

Add a New Comment(Rich Markup)
   

You are not logged in

Please log in, so followups can be emailed to you.

 

Sun 31 Aug 2003 01:04:21 AM UTC, comment #1:

Is this really worth fixing or can it wait until
pristine trees just "go away"?

It's not really as simple as "always follow update by
adding the appropriate pristine" -- if you're updating
from some "other" branch, probably you don't want the
pristine, for example.

Tom Lord <tomlord>
Project MemberIn charge of this item.
Fri 22 Aug 2003 04:59:24 PM UTC, original submission:

From: "Robert Anderson" <RWA@sbcglobal.net>

Can someone remind me why update does not add the pristine tree
of the revision you just updated to? This is what larch did,
correct?

Tom Lord <tomlord>
Project MemberIn charge of this item.

 

(Note: upload size limit is set to 16384 kB, after insertion of the required escape characters.)

Attach File(s):
   
   
Comment:
   

No files currently attached

 

Depends on the following items: None found

Items that depend on this one: None found

 

CC list is empty

 

Do you think this task is very important?
If so, you can click here to add your encouragement to it.
This task has 0 encouragements so far.

Only logged-in users can vote.

 

Please enter the title of George Orwell's famous dystopian book (it's a date):

 

 

Follows 1 latest change.

Date Changed By Updated Field Previous Value => Replaced By
Sun 31 Aug 2003 01:04:20 AM UTCtomlordOpen/ClosedOpen=>(Error - Not Found)

Back to the top


Powered by Savane 3.1-cleanup1