GNU nano - Bugs: bug #48163, [Request] include Rust syntax...
You are not allowed to post comments on this tracker with your current authentication level.
bug #48163: [Request] include Rust syntax configuration
Submitter: | Dirkjan Ochtman <djc> | ||
Submitted: | Tue 07 Jun 2016 05:56:59 PM UTC | ||
Severity: | 1 - Wish | Status: | Fixed |
Assigned to: | bens | Open/Closed: | Closed |
Jump to the original submission
Wed 29 Jun 2016 01:34:13 PM UTC, comment #11: |
Benno Schulenberg <bens> |
Sat 25 Jun 2016 08:00:34 AM UTC, comment #10: Pushed to git, ba9214c.
|
Benno Schulenberg <bens> |
Thu 23 Jun 2016 07:36:51 PM UTC, comment #9: Yeah, that looks sensible to me. |
Dirkjan Ochtman <djc> |
Thu 23 Jun 2016 07:28:50 PM UTC, comment #8: Looking at the file, it says: "Copyright 2015 The Rust Project Developers." But as far as I can tell from the history on Github, the original author is Luke Francl, while the others contributed tiny tweaks. So shouldn't the copyright be marked as belonging to Luke? Or is he one of the Rust developers?
|
Benno Schulenberg <bens> |
Thu 23 Jun 2016 09:31:10 AM UTC, comment #7: Thanks.
|
Benno Schulenberg <bens> |
Thu 23 Jun 2016 07:42:27 AM UTC, comment #6: This seems pointless to me, because the next action is putting it in the nano repository. |
Dirkjan Ochtman <djc> |
Wed 22 Jun 2016 07:16:04 PM UTC, comment #5: Thanks, Dirkjan and Andrea and Luke and Tennix and Ben, for licensing your rust.nanorc contributions under the GPL v3.
|
Benno Schulenberg <bens> |
Wed 22 Jun 2016 03:06:52 PM UTC, comment #4: Finally, of course:
|
Dirkjan Ochtman <djc> |
Wed 22 Jun 2016 03:06:11 PM UTC, comment #3: Delivered-To: -email is unavailable-
|
Dirkjan Ochtman <djc> |
Sat 11 Jun 2016 12:06:43 PM UTC, comment #2: For your information, since receiving your response, I have emailed all contributors to the rust.nanorc file to see if they're willing to license it under nano's license. So far, I've received positive responses from two of them, and I just did another attempt to contact the other two. |
Dirkjan Ochtman <djc> |
Wed 08 Jun 2016 08:03:02 AM UTC, comment #1: It seems that the file is licensed under MIT/Apache. I don't want to include any other license files into nano. Could the file be relicensed under GPL version 3? |
Benno Schulenberg <bens> |
Tue 07 Jun 2016 05:56:59 PM UTC, original submission:
It would be nice to package the Rust configuration:
|
Dirkjan Ochtman <djc> |
Depends on the following items: None found
Items that depend on this one: None found
There are 0 votes so far. Votes easily highlight which items people would like to see resolved in priority, independently of the priority of the item set by tracker managers.
Follow 7 latest changes.
Date | Changed by | Updated Field | Previous Value | => | Replaced by |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2016-06-29 | bens | Open/Closed | Open | Closed | |
2016-06-25 | bens | Status | None | Fixed | |
2016-06-23 | bens | Attached File | - | Added rust.nanorc, #37561 | |
2016-06-23 | bens | Assigned to | None | bens | |
2016-06-23 | djc | Attached File | - | Added rust.nanorc, #37556 | |
2016-06-08 | bens | Severity | 3 - Normal | 1 - Wish | |
Summary | Include Rust syntax configuration | [Request] include Rust syntax configuration |
Powered by Savane 3.13-4b48.
Corresponding source code
Released.