Add a New Comment (Rich Markup)
I noticed that the Octave implementation of the integer data types is much more complete and useful than the Matlab (R2009b) implementation. (As far as I could tell you cannot in Matlab carry out any substantial computation in any integer modes. I just implemented computation of the inverse of the Hilbert matrix in int64. Works fine in Octave, cannot be done in Matlab.) The Matlab differences are nowhere that I could find mentioned in the Manual, Ch 4 Numeric Data Types might be a good place to point out the differences. Is his dealt with somewhere that I have missed? Somewhat off topic, it would also be helpful to have a Chapter titled "Summary of Octave Matlab differencs"... This could be a candidate for one of the Summer projects?
(Note: upload size limit is set to 16384 kB, after insertion of the required escape characters.)
Attach Files: Comment:
No files currently attached
Depends on the following items: None found
Items that depend on this one: None found
There are 0 votes so far. Votes easily highlight which items people would like to see resolved in priority, independently of the priority of the item set by tracker managers.
Only project members can vote.
Please enter the title of George Orwell's famous dystopian book (it's a date):
Follow 2 latest changes.
Copyright © 2023 Free Software Foundation, Inc. Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire article is permitted in any medium, provided this notice is preserved. The Levitating, Meditating, Flute-playing Gnu logo is a GNU GPL'ed image provided by the Nevrax Design Team. Source Code
Powered by Savane 3.12