(
Jump to the original submission)
Mon 21 Mar 2011 10:14:43 AM UTC, comment #6:
4d0e5b557aaba
|
Fri 18 Mar 2011 04:11:17 PM UTC, comment #5:
-rw-r--r-- 1 buildbot nogroup 36032352 Mar 18 16:18 gnash-0.8.9dev.tar.gz
By removing useless swfdec git history (nodist_ or shallow fetch):
-rw-r--r-- 1 buildbot nogroup 15248709 Mar 18 16:39 gnash-0.8.9dev.tar.gz
or
-rw-r--r-- 1 buildbot nogroup 12301965 Mar 18 16:42 gnash-0.8.9dev2.tar.bz2
12-15MB still too much? I'll revert.
|
Fri 18 Mar 2011 01:30:44 PM UTC, comment #4:
The swfdec sources wind up in the tarball because of the fetch via a dist-hook. Using filter-branch, the entire swfdec testsuite is a total of 53M, but 49M of it is the trace sub-directory. This includes the git history as well.
|
Fri 18 Mar 2011 01:24:49 PM UTC, comment #3:
This is about tarball, not fetching. How big is the smaller version ?
|
Fri 18 Mar 2011 01:20:07 PM UTC, comment #2:
The release branch has dropped this already. I did make a much smaller swfdec git repo using filter-branch, so maybe we should just host this on gnashdev.org and suck it down from there.
|
Fri 18 Mar 2011 08:00:50 AM UTC, comment #1:
Agreed. We shouldn't make swfdec part of the tarball (nor part of the same repository, IMHO).
|
Fri 18 Mar 2011 07:52:04 AM UTC, original submission:
After addition of the entire swfdec tree, the Gnash tarball is 34MB rather than 5-6, which is excessive both for distribution and for downloading. Can we please remove swfdec from the dist?
|
(Note: upload size limit is set to 16384 kB, after insertion of the required
escape characters.)
Attach File(s):
Comment:
No files currently attached
Depends on the following items: None found
Items that depend on this one: None found
Follow 5 latest changes.