bugDDD - Bugs: bug #27945, control over including libelf

 
 

bug #27945: control over including libelf

Submitter:  Alex Schuster <wonkothesane>
Submitted:  Thu 05 Nov 2009 12:01:17 PM UTC
 
Category:  Build Severity:  3 - Normal
Item Group:  None Status:  Wont Fix
Privacy:  Public Assigned to:  None
Open/Closed:  Closed Release:  3.3.12-rc1
* Mandatory Fields

Add a New Comment (Rich Markup)
   

Comment Type & Canned Response:
       No canned response available

 

Wed 28 Dec 2022 07:44:08 PM UTC, comment #1: 

it is not the responsibility of a package manager to handle user compiled binaries.

Stefan Eickeler <eickeler>
Project Administrator
Thu 05 Nov 2009 12:01:17 PM UTC, original submission:  

Hi there,

I am not sure if this is considered a bug. I am a Gentoo user, everything is built from source there. So it's important to know the dependencies of a package. For ddd, elfutils is not in the dependency tree, because it also builds fine without it. But if it is available anyway, ddd does link to libelf.

So, when cleaning up unneeded packages, Gentoo lists elfutils as a package nothing depends on, but then realizes that the ddd binray links to libelf nevertheless, and complains.

This is no serious problem, but it's not nice as well, giving the users some confusing output.

So, a solution might be some --with[out]-elf switch for the configure script to control usage of libelf. I do not know what libelf is being used for, what is needed instead if it if not available, and if there also should be a switch for that.

Alex Schuster <wonkothesane>

 

(Note: upload size limit is set to 16384 kB, after insertion of the required escape characters.)

Attach Files:
   
   
Comment:
   

No files currently attached

 

Depends on the following items: None found

Items that depend on this one: None found

 

Carbon-Copy List
  • -email is unavailable- added by eickeler (Updated the item)
  • -email is unavailable- added by wonkothesane (Submitted the item)
  •  

    There are 0 votes so far. Votes easily highlight which items people would like to see resolved in priority, independently of the priority of the item set by tracker managers.

    Only logged-in users can vote.

     

     

     

     

    Follow 2 latest changes.

    Date Changed by Updated Field Previous Value => Replaced by
    2022-12-28 eickeler StatusNone Wont Fix
    2022-12-28 eickeler Open/ClosedOpen Closed

    Back to the top

    Powered by Savane 3.9