Sun 20 Apr 2008 10:40:53 AM UTC, original submission:
This is from Jacob Poon's report of 2007-10,
https://savannah.gnu.org/support/?106274
In the 2006 release, a lot of letters in the extended Cyrillic ranges were incorrect, often being another character that would have formed a part of the correct glyph. (Perhaps someone had started to construct these glyphs, and was interrupted...)
I have some time ago deleted all these wrong letters, and will make a policy that no glyph is better than a wrong glyph.
---------------------------------------------------------------
Cyrillic letters er with tick (U+48E-48F) in BoldOblique font do not have tick.
Cyrillic capital letter Ghe with middle hook (U+494) in BoldOblique font, Cyrillic small letter ghe with middle hook (U+495) in bold fonts are incorrectly drawn with Cyrillic letter Ghe.
Cyrillic letters Bashkir ka (U+4A0-4A1) in bold fonts do not have upper left hooks.
Cyrillic ligatures En Ghe (U+4A4-4A5) in bold fonts do not have upper right hooks.
Cyrillic capital letter Pe with middle hook (U+4A6) in BoldOblique font, Cyrillic small letter pe with middle hook (U+4A7) in bold fonts are incorrectly drawn without middle hook.
Cyrillic letters es with descender (U+4AA-4AB) in bold fonts do not have cedilla.
Cyrillic letters abkhasian che (U+4BC-4BF) in bold fonts look like Latin letter C instead of heavier version of the non-bold glyphs.
Cyrillic letters Ka with hook (U+4C3-4C4) in bold fonts do not have hooks.
Cyrillic letters En with hook (U+4C7-4C8) in bold fonts do not have hooks.
Cyrillic letters Khakassian che (U+4CB-4CC) in bold fonts do not have tails.
Cyrillic letters schwa (U+4D8-4DB) in bold fonts do not look like inverted Latin letters e.
|