Thu 29 Dec 2005 10:29:26 PM UTC, original submission:
From http://bugs.debian.org/274156
From: Michael Banck <mbanck@debian.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: inetutils: FTBFS on hurd-i386: Missing IPV6
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 03:39:02 +0200
Package: inetutils
Severity: important
inetutils-ping's install-target in debian/rules wants to cp a ping6
binary which does not get built on hurd-i386, as it has no IPV6 support:
Automatic build of inetutils_1.4.2+20040207-3 on debian by sbuild/hurd-i386 1.169
Build started at 20040929-0242
******************************************************************************
inetutils_1.4.2+20040207-3.dsc exists in cwd
- Using build dependencies supplied by package:
Build-Depends: cdbs (>= 0.4.13), debhelper (>= 4.1.0), libreadline4-dev, libpam0g-dev, libopie-dev, automake1.8, autoconf, bison, zlib1g-dev
Build-Conflicts: autoconf2.13
[...]
checking for AF_INET6... yes
checking for IPV6_V6ONLY... no
configure: WARNING: IPv6 support not available, disabling IPv6
[...]
dh_installdirs -pinetutils-ping
mkdir debian/tmp/bin
mv debian/tmp/usr/bin/ping debian/tmp/bin/
mv debian/tmp/usr/bin/ping6 debian/tmp/bin/
mv: cannot stat `debian/tmp/usr/bin/ping6': No such file or directory
make: *** [install/inetutils-ping] Error 1
******************************************************************************
Build finished at 20040929-0300
FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]
Michael
From: Robert Millan <rmh@debian.org>
To: Michael Banck <mbanck@debian.org>, -unavailable-
Cc: -unavailable-
Subject: Re: Bug #273962: inetutils: FTBFS on hurd-i386: Missing IPV6
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 18:07:31 +0200
reassign 273962 hurd
retitle 273962 pfinet lacks ipv6 support
thanks
On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 03:39:02AM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> Package: inetutils
> Severity: important
>
> inetutils-ping's install-target in debian/rules wants to cp a ping6
> binary which does not get built on hurd-i386, as it has no IPV6 support:
IPV6 is a kernel-agnostic standard and there are many packages that depend
on it. You really need to provide it for any complete Debian GNU port. I
suggest you upload a hacked inetutils package to gnuab. Implementing an ipv6
interface with dummy (ENOSYS) stubs is also a good workaround IMHO.
From: Guillem Jover <guillem@debian.org>
To: Robert Millan <rmh@debian.org>, -unavailable-
Cc: Michael Banck <mbanck@debian.org>, -unavailable-
Subject: Re: Bug #273962: inetutils: FTBFS on hurd-i386: Missing IPV6
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 02:05:58 +0200
package hurd
clone 273962 -1
severity -1 wishlist
reassign 273962 inetutils
retitle 273962 inetutils: FTBFS on hurd-i386, missing IPv6
thanks
On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 06:07:31PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 03:39:02AM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> > Package: inetutils
> > Severity: important
> >
> > inetutils-ping's install-target in debian/rules wants to cp a ping6
> > binary which does not get built on hurd-i386, as it has no IPV6 support:
> IPV6 is a kernel-agnostic standard and there are many packages that depend
> on it. You really need to provide it for any complete Debian GNU port. I
> suggest you upload a hacked inetutils package to gnuab. Implementing an ipv6
> interface with dummy (ENOSYS) stubs is also a good workaround IMHO.
No, the package built before the introduction of IPv6 support, so it's
a regression in inetutils. I'm uploading a fixed inetutils to Debian.
IPv6 support on the Hurd is a wishlist.
regards,
guillem
|