Wed 08 Nov 2006 09:52:28 AM UTC, comment #1:
Works fine for me in the latest build, I click hint and get:
1. Cubeful 2-ply 3/off 1/off Eq.: +1.956
1.000 1.000 0.535 - 0.000 0.000 0.000
2-ply cubeful 100% speed [world class]
2. Cubeful 2-ply 3/2 3/off Eq.: +1.956 ( +0.000)
1.000 1.000 0.000 - 0.000 0.000 0.000
2-ply cubeful 100% speed [world class]
3. Cubeful 2-ply 3/off 2/1 Eq.: +1.956 ( +0.000)
1.000 1.000 0.000 - 0.000 0.000 0.000
2-ply cubeful 100% speed [world class]
Which is obviously ok - perhaps you got the info another way (or it's been changed).
|
Sun 22 Aug 2004 05:49:38 PM UTC, original submission:
Analysis of :
Position ID: +wYI6ALbAAAAAA
Match ID : EYFmAAAAAAAA
gives :
Rolled 51 (+0,000):
1. Cubeful 2-ply 3/2 3/off Eq.: +1,956
1,000 1,000 0,218 - 0,000 0,000 0,000
2. Cubeful 2-ply 3/off 2/1 Eq.: +1,956 ( +0,000)
1,000 1,000 0,218 - 0,000 0,000 0,000
- ?? Cubeful 2-ply 3/off 1/off Eq.: +1,956 ( +0,000)
1,000 1,000 0,461 - 0,000 0,000 0,000
1) The "??" number doesn't make sense. There are only 3 possible moves.
2) The ordering of the moves is not very sensible. Of course it doesn't matter given the match situation, but why not put the one that leads to more backgammons first ? (if everything else is equal, sort by money equity, or something like that).
|