PSPP - Patches: patch #5562, line-buffer / getl_ reorganisation
You are not allowed to post comments on this tracker with your current authentication level.
patch #5562: line-buffer / getl_ reorganisation
Submitter: | John Darrington <jmd> | ||
Submitted: | Fri 17 Nov 2006 03:29:59 AM UTC | ||
Category: | None | Item Group: | None |
Status: | Done | Assigned to: | None |
Open/Closed: | Closed |
Wed 29 Nov 2006 11:52:12 AM UTC, comment #4: |
John Darrington <jmd> |
Wed 29 Nov 2006 05:37:31 AM UTC, comment #3: I'm pretty happy with this. Nit-picking follows:
|
Ben Pfaff <blp> |
Sun 26 Nov 2006 05:14:30 AM UTC, comment #2: Here's another patch against the current HEAD.
|
John Darrington <jmd> |
Sat 18 Nov 2006 05:20:36 AM UTC, comment #1: I'm OK with this in principle given that (as you say) you recognize that the naming can be improved. I'm too tired at the moment to try to invent good ones right now.
|
Ben Pfaff <blp> |
Fri 17 Nov 2006 03:29:59 AM UTC, original submission:
This patch :
|
John Darrington <jmd> |
Depends on the following items: None found
Items that depend on this one: None found
There are 0 votes so far. Votes easily highlight which items people would like to see resolved in priority, independently of the priority of the item set by tracker managers.
Follow 12 latest changes.
Date | Changed by | Updated Field | Previous Value | => | Replaced by |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2006-11-29 | jmd | Status | Works For Me | Done | |
Assigned to | jmd | None | |||
Open/Closed | Open | Closed | |||
2006-11-29 | blp | Status | Ready For Test/Review | Works For Me | |
Assigned to | blp | jmd | |||
2006-11-26 | jmd | Status | Works For Me | Ready For Test/Review | |
Assigned to | jmd | blp | |||
Attached File | - | Added lb2.patch, #11356 | |||
2006-11-25 | blp | Status | Ready For Test/Review | Works For Me | |
Assigned to | blp | jmd | |||
2006-11-17 | jmd | Status | None | Ready For Test/Review | |
2006-11-17 | jmd | Attached File | - | Added lb.patch, #11286 |
Powered by Savane 3.13-4448.
Corresponding source code
Done.
I noticed a bug in the DO REPEAT feature, but it seems to predate anything I've done. So I've posted a bug report and not attempted to fix it.