SpamAssassin Milter Plugin - Patches: patch #4298, Catch spams which contain little...
You are not allowed to post comments on this tracker with your current authentication level.
patch #4298: Catch spams which contain little more than a URL
Submitter: | Nigel Horne <nigelhorne> | ||
Submitted: | Thu 11 Aug 2005 12:12:58 PM UTC | ||
Category: | None | Priority: | 5 - Normal |
Status: | None | Privacy: | Public |
Assigned to: | None | Open/Closed: | Open |
Mon 15 Aug 2005 03:46:54 PM UTC, comment #2: |
Dan Nelson <dnelson> |
Fri 12 Aug 2005 11:57:13 AM UTC, comment #1: Please change the declaration of
|
Nigel Horne <nigelhorne> |
Thu 11 Aug 2005 12:12:58 PM UTC, original submission:
This patch to the latest spamass-milter helps to stop message which consist of just a URL and maybe a few other messages. When spamass-milter is started with the -U option the URLs contained in the message are scanned for their likely spammism. There are a couple of TODOs and I'm not sure that the autoconf system works with my change (it needs to be CURL aware), but it's good enough for playing with. |
Nigel Horne <nigelhorne> |
Depends on the following items: None found
Items that depend on this one: None found
There are 0 votes so far. Votes easily highlight which items people would like to see resolved in priority, independently of the priority of the item set by tracker managers.
Follows 1 latest change.
Date | Changed by | Updated Field | Previous Value | => | Replaced by |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2005-08-11 | nigelhorne | Attached File | - | Added url_patch, #5009 |
Powered by Savane 3.13-4448.
Corresponding source code
This really feels like it should be spamassassin's job. HTML pages are more likely to trigger spamassassin's html triggers (obviously), and I don't know what it would think about complex pages likely to to be referenced in non-spam emails (news sites, etc). I'm worried about the false-positive rate, and what effect pulling in all those html pages would have on the bayes database (for both spam and ham).