/[storm]/storm/doc/pegboard/storm_gisp_simulation--hemppah/peg.rst
ViewVC logotype

Diff of /storm/doc/pegboard/storm_gisp_simulation--hemppah/peg.rst

Parent Directory Parent Directory | Revision Log Revision Log | View Patch Patch

revision 1.13 by hemppah, Thu Jun 5 08:38:09 2003 UTC revision 1.14 by hemppah, Thu Jun 5 09:12:22 2003 UTC
# Line 131  ISSUE: Line 131  ISSUE:
131    
132     Do we want to keep GISP or move to Kademlia or some other?     Do we want to keep GISP or move to Kademlia or some other?
133        
134       RESOLVED:
135      
136       I think we can use GISP as long as we do not deploy Storm
137       into a "production use", i.e., we use GISP more like a P2P
138       testing platform for Storm rather than "the best and the final"
139       choice for Storm.
140      
141       However, the problem is that how soon the deployment
142       will happen (I don't know anything about the milestones :)).
143      
144       Currently, I see Kademlia as the best alternative to us, but
145       as we just got finished a working Storm/GISP
146       implementation, do we really want to move an another
147       algorithm/protocol immediately ?
148      
149       OTOH, it's obvious that better and better P2P algorithms
150       are invented in the future. The question is that do we
151       want to wait those algorithms, or do we want to use
152       the algorithms which are currently available ?  
153      
154    ISSUE:
155      
156       Do we want to implement currently available P2P lookup
157       algorithm ourselves, or do we want to develop a novel
158       P2P lookup algorithm ourselves ?      
159      
160      
161  Plan  Plan
162  ====  ====
163    

Legend:
Removed from v.1.13  
changed lines
  Added in v.1.14

savannah-hackers-public@gnu.org
ViewVC Help
Powered by ViewVC 1.1.26