6 |
|
|
7 |
\if0 |
\if0 |
8 |
|
|
9 |
Issues |
.. Issues |
10 |
====== |
====== |
11 |
|
|
12 |
- most important: what is our central thesis / hypothesis / thing? |
- most important: what is our central thesis / hypothesis / thing? |
13 |
There are lots of nice technologies and ideas but we need the |
There are lots of nice technologies and ideas but we need the |
14 |
"one idea to rule them all" ;) ((been rereading Tolkien) ;) |
"one idea to rule them all" ;) ((been rereading Tolkien) ;) |
15 |
We have: |
We have: |
16 |
|
|
17 |
- xu structure |
- xu structure |
18 |
|
|
32 |
|
|
33 |
- user editability |
- user editability |
34 |
|
|
35 |
**RESOLVED**: Most important is the non-disruptive f+c link structure, |
**RESOLVED**: Most important is the non-disruptive f+c link structure, |
36 |
and the visual stuff that helps understanding it. The xu structure is not |
and the visual stuff that helps understanding it. The xu structure is not |
37 |
so novel and not so important in xupdf: the link model is actually |
so novel and not so important in xupdf: the link model is actually |
38 |
more general. As for editability, like Benja says :: |
more general. As for editability, like Benja says :: |
39 |
|
|
40 |
<benja> tuomasl: I think that's... a benefit, but not the point |
<benja> tuomasl: I think that's... a benefit, but not the point |
41 |
<benja> since it's too well-known |
<benja> since it's too well-known |
42 |
<benja> I mean, shout 'should users be able to make links while browsing' into the audience and you'll get back |
<benja> I mean, shout 'should users be able to make links while browsing' into the audience and you'll get back |
43 |
'YEEEEES!' ;-) |
'YEEEEES!' ;-) |
44 |
|
|
45 |
Spatial canvases might be nice but might be too much work. |
Spatial canvases might be nice but might be too much work. |
46 |
|
|
47 |
- What to call xupdf? We need some name for the view & structure demonstrated here. |
- What to call xupdf? We need some name for the view & structure demonstrated here. |
48 |
Gzz is much more than this, but xupdf is not necessarily ideal ;) |
Gzz is much more than this, but xupdf is not necessarily ideal ;) |
49 |
|
|
50 |
- why left-right, why not some other set of directions? |
- why left-right, why not some other set of directions? |
51 |
|
|
52 |
RESOLVED: (needs to be explained in text): |
RESOLVED: (needs to be explained in text): |
53 |
|
|
54 |
- screen aspect, TV aspect 4:3 --> 16:9! |
- screen aspect, TV aspect 4:3 --> 16:9! |
55 |
|
|
56 |
- left and right hand |
- left and right hand |
57 |
|
|
58 |
- the above points only partly resolve the issue. More importantly, |
- the above points only partly resolve the issue. More importantly, |
59 |
why should there be exactly two possible directions and not four |
why should there be exactly two possible directions and not four |
60 |
or the full set of directions on a circle. |
or the full set of directions on a circle. |
61 |
It could be argued that more variation in the directions would |
It could be argued that more variation in the directions would |
62 |
yield more visual features for distinguishing between different links. |
yield more visual features for distinguishing between different links. |
63 |
|
|
64 |
- Do we differentiate between different link types/directions such as |
- Do we differentiate between different link types/directions such as |
65 |
- left-right |
- left-right |
66 |
- past-future |
- past-future |
67 |
- source-referer |
- source-referer |
68 |
- created by document author/user? |
- created by document author/user? |
69 |
|
|
70 |
|
|
71 |
EXPLAIN ANIMATION! FOR US, OBVIOUS, BUT NEED SCREENSHOTS OF COMPLETE ANIMATION |
EXPLAIN ANIMATION! FOR US, OBVIOUS, BUT NEED SCREENSHOTS OF COMPLETE ANIMATION |
72 |
SEQUENCE BETWEEN NODES!!! |
SEQUENCE BETWEEN NODES!!! |
73 |
|
|
|
.. raw:: latex |
|
|
|
|
|
\fi |
|
74 |
|
|
75 |
Abstract |
Abstract |
76 |
======== |
======== |