i wanted to do questioning on this because it's along the lines of what Nuernberg et. al. have been working on since Open Hypermedia, in Structural Computing. the basic idea is to abandon the notion of 'data' as a basic unit(?) of information, and focus on structure instead. 'data' is then seen as exceptional structure, where is no structure (i.e. a document with no links?). so: as in storm a central issue is danglink links, are we actually talking about 'structure mobility', not 'data mobility', the structural computing people might ask? i don't think it matters much, if you think how the design actually works, or? we don't actually take a stand on how links are dealt with -- i.e. the applications that use storm may embed them in the documents, store them externally (as separate blocks?) or not have links at all. right? #gzz> benja: the question: what's the definition of data here? an-toni, in which context? "data mobility?" or what? #gzz> benja: the article, yes an-toni, documents and document content...