191 |
Related Work |
Related Work |
192 |
============ |
============ |
193 |
|
|
194 |
Dangling links |
Dangling links and alternative versions |
195 |
-------------- |
--------------------------------------- |
196 |
|
|
197 |
The dangling link problem has received a lot of attention |
The dangling link problem has received a lot of attention |
198 |
in hypermedia research (e.g. [davis98referential]_). As examples, we examine the ways |
in hypermedia research (e.g. [davis98referential]_). As examples, we examine the ways |
248 |
it would be possible to find both the document and links to it, |
it would be possible to find both the document and links to it, |
249 |
no matter which peer in the network they are stored on. |
no matter which peer in the network they are stored on. |
250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alternative versions |
|
|
-------------------- |
|
|
|
|
251 |
Version control systems like CVS or RCS [tichy85rcs]_ usually assume |
Version control systems like CVS or RCS [tichy85rcs]_ usually assume |
252 |
a central server hosting a repository. The WebDAV/DeltaV protocols, |
a central server hosting a repository. The WebDAV/DeltaV protocols, |
253 |
designed for interoperability between version control systems, inherit |
designed for interoperability between version control systems, inherit |
257 |
to branch and merge overlapping repositories without any central control |
to branch and merge overlapping repositories without any central control |
258 |
[is there a specific ref for this?]. |
[is there a specific ref for this?]. |
259 |
|
|
260 |
Lotus Notes [ref], popular database sharing and collaboration tool, has some |
XXX |
261 |
|
Lotus Notes [ref], a popular database sharing and collaboration tool, has some |
262 |
similarities to Storm. In both systems, for instance, data is identified by |
similarities to Storm. In both systems, for instance, data is identified by |
263 |
using GUIDs. However, partly because of the long age of the system, Lotus Notes |
using GUIDs. However, partly because of the long age of the system, Lotus Notes |
264 |
is limited to client-server architecture, whereas Storm exploits adaptive peer-to-peer |
is limited to client-server architecture, whereas Storm exploits adaptive peer-to-peer |
265 |
architecture. Groove [ref] is an improved design of Lotus Notes, which employs |
architecture. Groove [groovesuri]_ is an improved design of Lotus Notes, which employs |
266 |
strong security mechanisms and uses peer-to-peer functionality |
strong security mechanisms and uses peer-to-peer functionality |
267 |
as the basis of communication channels among limited amount of participants. |
as the basis of communication channels among limited amount of participants. |
268 |
Neither of these systems supports the immutability of data. |
Neither of these systems supports the immutability of data. |
269 |
|
|
270 |
[ref HTML version format proposal] Alternate versions important for |
.. [ref HTML version format proposal] Alternate versions important for |
271 |
authoring process [search refs]. (Note: Keeping track of versions |
authoring process [search refs]. (Note: Keeping track of versions |
272 |
structure is also \*hyper*media. Refs?) (WebDAV!) |
structure is also \*hyper*media. Refs?) (WebDAV!) |
273 |
|
|
274 |
.. review: http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/griffiths99contentspec.html ? |
.. review: http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/griffiths99contentspec.html ? |
275 |
couldn't find a relevant angle, as it's a storage /protocol/. hm |
couldn't find a relevant angle, as it's a storage /protocol/. hm |