3 |
|
|
4 |
- `Standing on the shoulders of giants`_: Webrotting example |
- `Standing on the shoulders of giants`_: Webrotting example |
5 |
- History of location-dependence: `TBL ref`_ |
- History of location-dependence: `TBL ref`_ |
|
- Problems with location-depencence, other articles |
|
|
recognizing these |
|
6 |
- Location-independent, semantic-free, *self-verifying* |
- Location-independent, semantic-free, *self-verifying* |
7 |
identifiers (ref SFR paper (Balakrishnan et.al. IPTPS'03), |
identifiers (ref SFR paper (Balakrishnan et.al. IPTPS'03), |
8 |
ref Walfish paper) |
ref Walfish paper); example: hash-based (ref |
9 |
- Benefits of hash-based addressing: |
``hash`` URN namespace Internet-Draft; ref Freenet & others) |
10 |
|
- Proposal: A location-independent Web (closest thing is Freenet (ref)) |
11 |
|
- Benefits of hash-based addressing |
12 |
|
|
13 |
- Pages easily movable between servers |
- Pages easily movable between servers |
14 |
- Data accessible as long as anyone keeps a copy |
- Data accessible as long as anyone keeps a copy |
15 |
- Load balancing (download from everyone who has a copy) |
- Load balancing (download from everyone who has a copy) |
16 |
- Can use one addressing scheme with different protocols, |
- Can use one addressing scheme with different protocols, |
17 |
searching different networks for the content behind a hash |
searching different networks for the content behind a hash |
|
(see the ``hash`` URN namespace proposal) |
|
18 |
|
|
|
- Closest thing to location-independent is actually, it seems, Freenet |
|
19 |
- SFR (semantic-free referencing) not all that close, |
- SFR (semantic-free referencing) not all that close, |
20 |
though semantic-free idea shared (SFR takes along |
though semantic-free idea shared (SFR takes along |
21 |
many problems of the Web) |
many problems of the Web) |