155 |
|
|
156 |
|
|
157 |
|
|
158 |
RDF and ZigZag(tm) structure are actually closely |
From IRC, starting to explain what this is all about (by Benja):: |
|
related: ZigZag(tm) is obtained if a RDF graph is constrained |
|
|
by two uniqueness conditions: for all x, y, there can be |
|
|
at most one triple of the form (x, y, *), and |
|
|
at most one triple of the form (*, x, y). |
|
159 |
|
|
160 |
|
> this was very good-- I think I understand *much* better now... |
161 |
|
> first thing I realized was that before the last few days, |
162 |
|
it has been Fenfire = 42 for me: |
163 |
|
> I had a relatively clear idea about how it'll work, and it was |
164 |
|
completely clear that this is the right way to do things-- |
165 |
|
> so I had the answer, so over the last few days I've |
166 |
|
really been wondering, what was the question? ;-) |
167 |
|
> the question, I think, is: How can hypermedia become an extension |
168 |
|
to our mind? -- this has been the vision all along |
169 |
|
since Vannemar Bush, in some senses at least, and also in |
170 |
|
the mobile computing field in a sense |
171 |
|
> so that we feel it like, well, an extension |
172 |
|
> and the answer is: with an item-based hypermedial |
173 |
|
(desktop? computing?) environment |
174 |
|
> i.e., the point about fenfire/zz/hyperstructure is that it |
175 |
|
*reifies the things you care about as first-class items* |
176 |
|
> s/items/objects/ |
177 |
|
> How can hypermedia become the thing that we use daily, |
178 |
|
without thinking about it, when we're thinking about |
179 |
|
something *else*? |
180 |
|
> this is what sets hyperstructure apart from e.g. |
181 |
|
navigational hypertext: |
182 |
|
> the things that you connect hypertextually are *concepts* |
183 |
|
> ok, this isn't in itself a new idea I'm sure; there are systems |
184 |
|
that use it, and Aquanet is one of them |
185 |
|
> the point is to make *this* the basis of *all computing* |
186 |
|
> which may be seen as an evolutionary step-- but there you are, |
187 |
|
this is what we're doing |
188 |
|
> everything else you do when you use your system wraps around that |
189 |
|
> you don't have applications, which tell you how to think-- |
190 |
|
you have views that show a part of the structure in a useful way, |
191 |
|
but still are woven into the item-based structure. |
192 |
|
|
193 |
|
|
194 |
|
|
195 |
|
|
196 |
|
RDF and ZigZag(tm) structure are actually closely |
197 |
|
related: ZigZag(tm) is obtained if a RDF graph is constrained |
198 |
|
by two uniqueness conditions: for all x, y, there can be |
199 |
|
at most one triple of the form (x, y, *), and |
200 |
|
at most one triple of the form (*, x, y). |