/[gzz]/manuscripts/FutureVision/review-answers-benja.txt
ViewVC logotype

Diff of /manuscripts/FutureVision/review-answers-benja.txt

Parent Directory Parent Directory | Revision Log Revision Log | View Patch Patch

revision 1.1 by benja, Sat Nov 8 13:43:54 2003 UTC revision 1.2 by benja, Sat Nov 8 13:58:11 2003 UTC
# Line 176  Rather short! Ok :-) Well, let's give so Line 176  Rather short! Ok :-) Well, let's give so
176      I wrote something about this in my Journal. We've adopted so much of Ted's      I wrote something about this in my Journal. We've adopted so much of Ted's
177      viewpoint that we've become contrarians, but technophobes? ;)      viewpoint that we've become contrarians, but technophobes? ;)
178    
   
179          In particular, I believe that there is the basis of some really          In particular, I believe that there is the basis of some really
180          interesting Semantic Web work here, where item-based editing and display          interesting Semantic Web work here, where item-based editing and display
181          is just one application of in terms of application-neutral, semantically          is just one application of in terms of application-neutral, semantically
182          modelled data.          modelled data.
183    
   
184      Do you get the point of this?      Do you get the point of this?
185    
186    RDF is a structured data format. The stuff that the SemWeb people
187    are interested in is to program things that process this data
188    automatically. We're doing editing and displaying of a network of items,
189    which is data. So this reviewer is saying that we could operate
190    on the same data as the Semantic Web people, have their tools
191    operate on data entered through our system and have their data
192    displayed by us.
193    
194        --
195    
196          The presentation of the paper though is currently too bitty - too many          The presentation of the paper though is currently too bitty - too many
197          unelaborated claims interspersed with irrelevant technical details.          unelaborated claims interspersed with irrelevant technical details.
198    
   
199      Ok, how will we address this.      Ok, how will we address this.
200    
201    Go through the paper, keep an eye open for these, decide in each case
202    whether to a) cut b) elaborate c) insert "in our opinion."
203    
204        --
205    
206          Specific Comments--          Specific Comments--
207          Abstract: if we build systems structured around things we care about,          Abstract: if we build systems structured around things we care about,

Legend:
Removed from v.1.1  
changed lines
  Added in v.1.2

savannah-hackers-public@gnu.org
ViewVC Help
Powered by ViewVC 1.1.26