11 |
- XXX The references you give are |
- XXX The references you give are |
12 |
applicable, but aren't sufficient-- what do we do? |
applicable, but aren't sufficient-- what do we do? |
13 |
- Don't say "intertwingled" |
- Don't say "intertwingled" |
14 |
|
- Add illustration of zzstructure, comparing with RDF structure |
15 |
|
in 3.2 |
16 |
|
- Leave "relatively monolithic" out? |
17 |
|
- Look at & discuss RDFviz (give a somewhat better overview |
18 |
|
of RDF visualization...) |
19 |
|
- Animations of buoys &c |
20 |
|
- Leave libvob section out?? |
21 |
|
- Continue review in 4.1 beyond 1994 |
22 |
|
|
23 |
Examples |
Examples |
24 |
======== |
======== |
34 |
(Go through whole paper and look for instances:) |
(Go through whole paper and look for instances:) |
35 |
|
|
36 |
- Make it sound less like Ted speaking (according to reviewer)... |
- Make it sound less like Ted speaking (according to reviewer)... |
37 |
|
|
38 |
|
- Contrast what we propose with what Ted says... |
39 |
|
|
40 |
- Say where we conject, give reasons for why we believe |
- Say where we conject, give reasons for why we believe |
41 |
our claims |
our claims |
42 |
|
|
59 |
|
|
60 |
- XXX maybe give an 'everyday' example scenario? |
- XXX maybe give an 'everyday' example scenario? |
61 |
- refer to this from abstract? (We discuss...) |
- refer to this from abstract? (We discuss...) |
62 |
|
- It's not about "more" interconnections, it's about |
63 |
|
having items and their interconnections *at all* |
64 |
|
- Move discussion about paper notes here? |
65 |
|
|
66 |
- Relationship between items and documents: |
- Relationship between items and documents: |
67 |
|
|