/[guile]/guile/workbook/bugs/optargs-bound-gone
ViewVC logotype

Diff of /guile/workbook/bugs/optargs-bound-gone

Parent Directory Parent Directory | Revision Log Revision Log | View Patch Patch

revision 1.4 by ttn, Sat Apr 27 01:28:22 2002 UTC revision 1.5 by ttn, Wed May 1 21:25:09 2002 UTC
# Line 1  Line 1 
1  summary: 'bound?' from (ice-9 optargs) has been removed but is useful.  summary: 'bound?' from (ice-9 optargs) has been removed but is useful.
2  reported: Steve Tell <tell@telltronics.org>, 2002-03-29  reported: Steve Tell <tell@telltronics.org>, 2002-03-29
3  affects: HEAD branch_release-1-6  affects: HEAD branch_release-1-6
4  fixed: Marius Vollmer <mvo@zagadka.de>, 2002-02-22  proposed-fixed: Marius Vollmer <mvo@zagadka.de>, 2002-02-22
5    
6  mvo sez:  mvo sez:
7    
# Line 47  mvo sez: Line 47  mvo sez:
47  > as something you shouldn't expect to stick around, and now it's going  > as something you shouldn't expect to stick around, and now it's going
48  > away.  IMO, after we make sure we have an appropriate NEWS eulogy, we  > away.  IMO, after we make sure we have an appropriate NEWS eulogy, we
49  > can forget about it.  > can forget about it.
50    
51    2002-05-01 ttn sez:
52    
53    > i'm changing "fixed" header to "proposed-fixed" since it's not clear to me
54    > that the bug is fixed at this time.  probably we can find a way to provide
55    > `bound?' and yet not use SCM_UNDEFINED.  that would maintain continuation
56    > and honor the spirit of the change that introduced the bug (encapsulation).

Legend:
Removed from v.1.4  
changed lines
  Added in v.1.5

savannah-hackers-public@gnu.org
ViewVC Help
Powered by ViewVC 1.1.26