1 |
summary: 'bound?' from (ice-9 optargs) has been removed but is useful. |
summary: 'bound?' from (ice-9 optargs) has been removed but is useful. |
2 |
reported: Steve Tell <tell@telltronics.org>, 2002-03-29 |
reported: Steve Tell <tell@telltronics.org>, 2002-03-29 |
3 |
affects: HEAD branch_release-1-6 |
affects: HEAD branch_release-1-6 |
4 |
|
fixed: Marius Vollmer <mvo@zagadka.de>, 2002-02-22 |
5 |
tags: release-critical-1.6 |
tags: release-critical-1.6 |
6 |
|
|
7 |
The macro 'bound?' has been removed from (ice-9 optargs) since it used |
The macro 'bound?' has been removed from (ice-9 optargs) since it used |
25 |
(list x unbound-value))) |
(list x unbound-value))) |
26 |
BINDINGS))) |
BINDINGS))) |
27 |
`(,let-type ,(map proc bindings) ,@BODY))) |
`(,let-type ,(map proc bindings) ,@BODY))) |
28 |
|
|
29 |
|
--- |
30 |
|
|
31 |
|
No, we can't make that fix. We would be changing the default default |
32 |
|
value from '#f' to something else. That would be an unacceptable |
33 |
|
interface change. Since it is easy for the user to provide the |
34 |
|
functionality on its own, we can just leave it as it is. |