47 |
Past: |
Past: |
48 |
----- |
----- |
49 |
|
|
50 |
|
2003-07-06 [7h, 14.30-16.00, 16.15-17.45, 18.45-19.45, 20.00-22.30, 2.00-3.30]: |
51 |
|
|
52 |
|
- mail |
53 |
|
- think about Storm references & pointers |
54 |
|
- read Surety timestamping patents (<http://www.surety.com>). |
55 |
|
timestamping will likely be *very* important |
56 |
|
to Storm... :-( |
57 |
|
- read about how the simplest form of timestamping, |
58 |
|
which Surety also claims, is free: they've lost |
59 |
|
a lawsuit against Entrust, who were leading (say they) |
60 |
|
IETF standardization of the technique: |
61 |
|
<http://www.entrust.com/news/files/11_09_99_258.htm> |
62 |
|
- however, it appears that the forms of timestamping |
63 |
|
under consideration there require a trusted third party-- |
64 |
|
trusted enough that it can backdate documents! bad bad... |
65 |
|
- answer Matti's and Asko's answers to my PEG |
66 |
|
|
67 |
2003-07-05 [5.25h, 15.30-18.00, 22.00-22.45, 23.30-1.30]: |
2003-07-05 [5.25h, 15.30-18.00, 22.00-22.45, 23.30-1.30]: |
68 |
|
|
69 |
- read about XPackage (http://www.xpackage.org) |
- read about XPackage (http://www.xpackage.org) |