12 |
received opposition. This PEG is for discussing |
received opposition. This PEG is for discussing |
13 |
the nomenclature of the vocabularies. |
the nomenclature of the vocabularies. |
14 |
|
|
15 |
|
|
16 |
Issues |
Issues |
17 |
====== |
====== |
18 |
|
|
19 |
|
- Do we really need to rename things? |
20 |
|
|
21 |
|
RESOLVED: Yes. xuLink because of potential |
22 |
|
trademark stuff (improbable but possible; |
23 |
|
the vocabularies are far more hassle to change |
24 |
|
than e.g. web pages and javadocs), and PP link |
25 |
|
because PP is an entirely nondescriptive specific |
26 |
|
term for a generic concept, and is a *finnish* |
27 |
|
acronym of all things. |
28 |
|
|
29 |
Changes |
Changes |
30 |
======= |
======= |
31 |
|
|
32 |
|
|
33 |
In vocabularies (and possibly elsewhere), the connections |
In vocabularies (and possibly elsewhere), the connections |
34 |
that are now called xu links and PP links should |
that are now called xu links and PP links should |
35 |
be renamed to c-links and d-links for {content/constant} link |
be renamed to c-links and d-links for {content/constant} link |