GNU GRUB - Bugs: bug #38892, ZFS Support -- Add named property...
You are not allowed to post comments on this tracker with your current authentication level.
bug #38892: ZFS Support -- Add named property retrieval
Submitter: | Bob Ziuchkovski <bobziuchkovski> | ||
Submitted: | Sun 05 May 2013 04:13:13 AM UTC | ||
Category: | Booting | Severity: | Major |
Priority: | 5 - Normal | Item Group: | Feature Request |
Status: | Wont Fix | Privacy: | Public |
Assigned to: | None | Originator Name: | Bob Ziuchkovski |
Open/Closed: | Closed | Release: | Bazaar - trunk |
Release: | Reproducibility: | None | |
Planned Release: | None |
Tue 19 Nov 2013 08:10:44 PM UTC, comment #4: |
Vladimir Serbinenko <phcoder> |
Mon 04 Nov 2013 08:56:58 PM UTC, comment #3: I don't see how request to understand "given property" is different from "all properties". Again you can't request a feature to be able to read just any property. If that what you request then it's a clear "won't fix". Some specific properties can be considered. |
Vladimir Serbinenko <phcoder> |
Mon 04 Nov 2013 08:44:44 PM UTC, comment #2: The feature I'm requesting would allow a user to retrieve the value of a single property from a single dataset and store it to a variable. So it's not a request to understand and handle all of the different types of ZFS properties. Instead, it is a request to be able to access the value of a given property for a specific dataset. |
Bob Ziuchkovski <bobziuchkovski> |
Sun 03 Nov 2013 04:30:06 PM UTC, comment #1: ZFS doesn't have something like a central list of properties. They are spread across different objects and handled very differently. Supporting all of them doesn't make sense. You need to tell exact options and explain usecases. |
Vladimir Serbinenko <phcoder> |
Sun 05 May 2013 04:13:13 AM UTC, original submission:
This is a feature request to add named property retrieval for ZFS datasets. I am envisioning something along the lines of:
|
Bob Ziuchkovski <bobziuchkovski> |
No files currently attached
Depends on the following items: None found
Items that depend on this one: None found
There are 0 votes so far. Votes easily highlight which items people would like to see resolved in priority, independently of the priority of the item set by tracker managers.
Follow 2 latest changes.
Date | Changed by | Updated Field | Previous Value | => | Replaced by |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2013-11-19 | phcoder | Status | None | Wont Fix | |
Open/Closed | Open | Closed |
Powered by Savane 3.13-758e.
Corresponding source code
As explained before, ability to retrieve every option is too costly in code and nobody provided rationale as to which properties would be useful. The later in itself puts greate doubt on usefulness to retrieving properties in the first place. closing as "won't fix".