bugGNU gettext - Bugs: bug #29900, Feature request : make file...


You are not allowed to post comments on this tracker with your current authentication level.

bug #29900: Feature request : make file extension .gtkbuilder a new extension for gnome glade files

Submitted by:  None
Submitted on:  Mon 17 May 2010 08:53:21 PM UTC  
Category:  Glade Severity:  3 - Normal
Item Group:  None Status:  Fixed
Privacy:  Public Assigned to:  Miguel Ángel Arruga Vivas <m1gu3l>
Open/Closed:  Closed

Sat 15 Jun 2013 07:59:28 AM UTC, comment #4:

It should be fixed with the latest git master, although only the .ui file extention is recognized.

Daiki Ueno <ueno>
Project Administrator
Fri 01 Mar 2013 08:08:05 PM UTC, comment #3:

It can be tested at https://github.com/644rosen/gettext_gtkbuilder_support.git

Miguel Ángel Arruga Vivas <m1gu3l>
Project MemberIn charge of this item.
Sat 02 Oct 2010 10:40:34 AM UTC, comment #2:

The answers to these questions are:

  • Yes. libglade files and gtkbuilder files are two seperate animals (although they are similar, and have the same purpose).
  • Yes intltool-extract version 0.41.1 seems to extract gtkbuilder file strings if you give it the --type=gettext/glade option. (it seems to automatically distinguish between libglade files and gtkbuilder files)
John Darrington <jmd>
Thu 20 May 2010 11:02:26 PM UTC, comment #1:


Thanks for the suggestion.

Since I am not a GNOME developer, the situation is not clear to
me, and I need a bit of your help in order to understand what
needs to be done:
- Can you point me to some example .gtkbuilder files
(preferrably in some released tarballs or under version
control of some project)?
- Can you point me to the specification of .gtkbuilder files
(how they are meant to be structured, or the schema if it's
an XML file format).
- I see that there is a tool "gtk-builder-convert" whose job
is to convert glade files to .gtkbuilder files. So presumably
the two file types are not the same?
- Is there support for .gtkbuilder files in some intltool

Guessing the file type with libmagic is something that is too
unreliable. Let's leave this idea aside.

Bruno Haible <haible>
Project Administrator
Mon 17 May 2010 08:53:21 PM UTC, original submission:

OR... even better try to guess the file type with libmagic !



No files currently attached


Depends on the following items: None found

Items that depend on this one: None found


Carbon-Copy List
  • -email is unavailable- added by ueno (Posted a comment)
  • -email is unavailable- added by m1gu3l (Posted a comment)
  • -email is unavailable- added by samuellb
  • -email is unavailable- added by jmd (Posted a comment)
  • -email is unavailable- added by haible (Posted a comment)

    Do you think this task is very important?
    If so, you can add your encouragement to it.
    This task has 0 encouragements so far.

    Only logged-in users can vote.




    Follow 8 latest changes.

    Date Changed by Updated Field Previous Value => Replaced by
    2016-11-27 haible CategoryNone => Glade
    2013-06-15 ueno StatusReady For Test => Fixed
        Open/ClosedOpen => Closed
    2013-03-01 m1gu3l StatusNeed Info => Ready For Test
        Assigned tohaible => m1gu3l
    2012-04-20 samuellb Carbon-Copy- => Added samuellb
    2010-05-20 haible StatusNone => Need Info
        Assigned toNone => haible

    Back to the top

    Powered by Savane 3.3